Published online December 12, 2024
https://doi.org/10.5141/jee.24.081
Journal of Ecology and Environment (2024) 48:48
Jin-Young Kim1 , Jeong-Ki Min2 , Ye Ji Kim3 , Yong Su Park1 and Dongsoo Kong3*
1Research Center for Endangered Species, National Institute of Ecology, Yeongyang 36531, Republic of Korea
2DaonEco Corporation, Sejong 30081, Republic of Korea
3Department of Life Science, Kyonggi University, Suwon 16227, Republic of Korea
Correspondence to:Dongsoo Kong
E-mail dskong@kgu.ac.kr
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ The publisher of this article is The Ecological Society of Korea in collaboration with The Korean Society of Limnology
Background: Koreoleptoxis globus is an endangered candidate species of snail in South Korean streams. This species primarily inhabits streams characterized by fast current velocities and coarse-particle streambed substrates. In this study, 12 types of probability distribution models, including exponential, normal, log-normal, logistic, Weibull, gamma, beta, and Gumbel, were used to quantitatively assess the physical microhabitat preferences of K. globus. The evaluation was based on data collected from 340 sampling units across 34 sites in South Korea between April 2024 and May 2024, focusing on variables such as water depth, current velocity, and streambed substrate.
Results: The best-fitting probability distribution models for each physical environmental factor were identified as follows: 1) water depth, inverted log-normal distribution, 2) current velocity, beta distribution, and 3) streambed substrate, Weibull distribution. Optimal water depth preferences ranged from 31.2 cm to 53.7 cm. Current velocity preferences ranged from 57.8 cm s-1 to 88.8 cm s-1. Substrate preferences ranged from −7.4 Φm to −5.6 Φm. The mean values for these factors were water depth of 35.8 cm, current velocity of 63.0 cm s-1, and streambed substrate of −5.7 Φm. Mode values were water depth of 44.4 cm, current velocity of 75.6 cm s-1, and substrate of −6.7 Φm. Standard deviation values were water depth of 15.8 cm, current velocity of 21.4 cm s-1, and streambed substrate of 1.5 Φm.
Conclusions: Overall, the beta and Weibull distribution models demonstrated a high degree of fit, likely owing to the inherent flexibility of these models. Beta distribution models were well suited for cases with negative skewness, whereas Weibull distribution models provided a better fit for cases with positive skewness. The physical habitat characteristics of K. globus were quantitatively demontrated to correspond to riffled areas. Further research is required to explore the interactions between physical environmental factors and the impact of habitat disturbance.
Keywords: current velocity, endangered candidate species, Koreoleptoxis globus, probability distribution models, streambed substrate, water depth
Globally, freshwater gastropods inhabit a wide range of aquatic environments, from lotic systems such as mountain streams to lentic habitats like wetlands (Johnson et al. 2013). Although they have adapted to diverse physical environmental changes, most freshwater gastropods exhibit limited mobility, and many species are endemic with restricted geographic ranges (Clements et al. 2006).
The aim of this study was to quantitatively determine a physically suitable habitat range for
As the frequency of concentrated rainfall events increases due to climate change, the risk of rapid fluctuations in stream discharge increases, which may compromise the stability of physical habitats (Kong and Kim 2016). Additionally, threats from artificial habitat disturbances, such as stream construction activities, are increasing. Hydrological changes, such as alterations in water flow, can disrupt the entire food chain of freshwater ecosystems (Joo et al. 2008). Temporary increases in discharge can lead to disturbances that reduce benthic algal populations, which, in turn, may decrease the population of benthic macroinvertebrates that depend on benthic algae for food (Gafner and Robinson 2007). Due to their limited mobility, gastropods have a restricted ability to escape from threats, making it difficult for aquatic ecosystems to recover once they are disrupted (Heino et al. 2002; Poff 1997). The aim of this study was to provide essential information for habitat conservation by delineating the physical habitat characteristics of
A total of 34 sites were sampled to determine the density of
Environmental factors were categorized into intervals (water depth: 15 cm, current velocity: 10 cm s-1, streambed substrate (
The relative frequency of occurrence (
The relative mean number of individuals
The combined relative abundance (
The combined relative abundance must first be converted into a discrete probability mass function (PMF) and then into a continuous PDF to continuously interpret the occurrence of taxa in relation to changes in physical environmental factors. Thus, the PMF value was determined by multiplying combined relative abundance by the range value of class interval (
According to Equation 4, the cumulative mass function (CMF) up to class μ was calculated using Equation 5. In Equation 5, the value of the CMF for all classes (m = k) equals 1.
The probability distribution models applied in this study were the same as those used by Kong and Kang (2023), comprising eight types divided into threshold values. Theses two-parameter models, i.e., exponential distribution (type 1), truncated normal distribution (type 2), logistic distribution (type 3), and Gumbel distribution (type 4); three-parameter models, i.e., log-normal distribution (type 5), Weibull distribution (type 6), and gamma distribution (type 7); and a four-parameter model, i.e., beta distribution (type 8). Additionally, four inverted models were included to interpret the negatively skewed distributions. These were inverted exponential distribution (type 1-1), inverted log-normal distribution (type 5-1), inverted Weibull distribution (type 6-1), and inverted gamma distribution (type 7-1). Thus, a total of 12 probability distribution models were used to analyze the physical habitat suitability for
The domain of random variables in each probability distribution model may differ from the actual range in which organisms are distributed. For example, while the domain of random variables in a normal or logistic distribution extends from -∞ to ∞, the mean and variance derived from these probability distribution models should be calculated based on the actual range of environmental factors where the organisms occur. Organism distribution patterns can be classified into the following cases: those with a dummy distribution when the range of environmental factors is from 0 to ∞ or 0 to a (Fig. 2A), those without a dummy distribution (Fig. 2B), those in the positive domain ranging from a to ∞ or a to b (Fig. 2C), and those that include negative domains, such as a to ∞, -∞ to b, or a to b (Fig. 2D). Since organisms can appear even at a current velocity of zero, their distribution may follow the pattern shown in Figure 2A, or the threshold-based pattern in Figure 2B. In contrast, since organisms cannot occur at a water depth of zero, their distribution may follow the pattern in Figure 2C, or the threshold-based pattern in Figure 2B. Furthermore, since the mean grain size of the substrate, when converted to phi values (
The parameters of the probability distribution were derived using the solver function in Microsoft Excel, by minimizing the normalized root mean squared error (NRMSE) between the CMF and CDF (Eq. 6).
The habitat suitability index (HSI) assessment method of the ‘United States Instream Flow and Aquatic Systems Group (Bovee 1986)’ was adopted. Suitability values of 1.0, 0.5, 0.1, and 0.05 were assigned to ranges of the probability distribution of 50%, 75%, 90%, and 95%, respectively. The optimal habitat range was determined on the basis of a threshold of 50%.
The NRMSEs between the CDF and CMF of each probability distribution model for the water depth of
Table 1 . Normalized root mean squared error (%) between cumulative mass function derived from combined relative abundance based on water depth, current velocity, and mean diameter gradient of substrate grain and cumulative distribution function of each model.
Model | Water depth | Current velocity | Streambed substrate (phi value) |
---|---|---|---|
Exponential | 26.10 | 17.52 | 4.12 |
N-exponential | 14.94 | 9.11 | 20.25 |
Normal | 4.52 | 1.12 | 3.06 |
Lognorma | 4.94 | 1.02 | 0.76 |
N-lognormal | 2.41 | 1.52 | 3.47 |
Logistic | 5.53 | 1.60 | 2.52 |
Weibull | 2.94 | 0.86 | 0.55 |
N-Weibull | 3.12 | 0.98 | 0.89 |
Gamma | 4.76 | 1.06 | 0.64 |
N-gamma | 2.48 | 1.98 | 3.34 |
Beta | 2.49 | 0.71 | 0.96 |
Gumbel | 7.99 | 1.41 | 0.81 |
Table 2 . Best-fit probability distribution models and corresponding statistical metrics for water depth, current velocity, and mean diameter gradient of substrate grain.
Water depth (cm) | Current velocity (cm s-1) | Streambed substrate (phi value) | |
---|---|---|---|
Model | N-lognormal | Beta | Weibull |
Mean | 35.8 | 63.0 | –5.7 |
Mode | 44.4 | 75.6 | –6.7 |
Standard deviation | 15.8 | 21.4 | 1.5 |
Table 3 . Habitat suitability range of
Range of habitat suitability | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
50% | 75% | 90% | 95% | |
Water depth (cm) | 31.2–53.7 | 20.2–58.0 | 9.5–60.9 | 4.3–61.9 |
Current velocity (cm s-1) | 57.8–88.8 | 44.3–94.7 | 31.1–98.0 | 23.7–99.1 |
Streambed substrate (phi value) | –7.4 to –5.6 | –7.7 to –4.7 | –7.8 to –3.5 | –7.8 to –2.5 |
The NRMSE between the CDF and CMF for the current velocity is listed in Table 1. The current velocity exhibited a negatively skewed distribution, with the beta distribution model providing the best fit (NRMSE = 0.71%). The Weibull distribution (NRMSE = 0.86%) and inverted Weibull distribution (NRMSE = 0.98%) models also demonstrated an excellent fit. Figure 4A illustrates the PMF of the current velocity for
The NRMSE between CDF and CMF for the mean particle size of the substrate is listed in Table 1. The streambed substrate exhibited a positively skewed distribution, with the Weibull distribution model (NRMSE of 0.55%) providing the best fit. The gamma (NRMSE of 0.64%) and log-normal (NRMSE of 0.76%) models also demonstrated an excellent fit. Figure 5A shows the PMF of the mean particle size of the substrate and the PDF of the best-fitting probability distribution model. Central values were as follows: mean value of −5.7 and mode value of −6.7 with a standard deviation of 1.5 in Table 2. Figure 5B shows the HSI for the streambed substrate of
As a stream flows from headwaters to large rivers, geomorphic and physical variables such as stream flow and channel morphology influence the composition of biological communities (Vannote et al. 1980). The key physical factors that affect benthic macroinvertebrates’ microhabitats include current velocity, substrate type, and water depth (Kim 2014; Kong and Kim 2017; Orth and Maughan 1983; Pan et al. 2015). Coarse-particle substrates such as rocks and gravel are predominant in areas with high current velocities (Church 2002). Incontrast, fine sediments such as sand are more prevalent in areas with low current velocities (Colby 1964). Clingers that attach to the surface of the streambed substrate are dominant in coarse substrates, whereas the habitat orientation group (HOG) shifts towards burrowers that dig into and inhabit the sediments in fine substrates (Kim et al. 2017). Kwon et al. (2013) classified the HOG of
Using 12 probability distribution models to evaluate the physical habitat suitability of
In a study by Kim (2014) on benthic macroinvertebrates in Gapyeong Stream, the primary occurrence range for clingers was reported as a current velocity of 6 cm s-1 to 15 cm s-1, a water depth of 20 cm to 50 cm, and a cobble substrate. Similarly, in a study focused on the Han River by Kim (2017), median values of environmental factors for the clinger genus
In this study, mean values of environmental factors for
Table 4 . Number and percentage of sampling units, mean diameter gradient of substrate grains and classification of lithophilic series according to substrate types.
No. | Substrate type | Average of mean particle diameter ( | Number and percentage (%) of sampling units of | Lithophilic series | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Bouldery cobble | –7.1 | 6 | 72 | Lithophilous |
2 | Pebbly cobble | –6.1 | 66 | ||
3 | Gravelly cobble | –5.4 | 6 | 10 | Psephophilous |
4 | Cobbly pebble | –5.2 | 4 | ||
5 | Pebble | –4.7 | - | 16 | Moderate |
6 | Copegra | –4.5 | 15 | ||
7 | Gravelly pebble | –4.1 | 1 | ||
8 | Cobbly gravel | –3.5 | 1 | 2 | Psammophilous |
9 | Pebbly gravel | –3.0 | 1 | ||
10 | Gravelly clay | –0.9 | - | - | Pelophilous |
Revised from the article of Kong and Kim (J Korean Soc Water Environ. 2016;32(1):1-14).
When selecting habitats, food source availability is one of the most critical factors for organisms. Variations in food sources across different habitats can be inffered from fatty acid composition extracted from tissues of target organisms (Shimma and Taguchi 1964), Fatty acids such as 20:5ω3, 18:2ω6, and 18:3ω3 in benthic macroinvertebrates can serve as biomarkers for algae and phytoplankton (Shin et al. 2012). According to Lim et al. (2009), the ratio of these fatty acids in
Analysis of the suitability of the physical microhabitat for the endangered candidate species
Not applicable.
CDF: Cumulative distribution function
CMF: Cumulative mass function
PDF: Probability density function
PMF: Probability mass function
HOG: Habitat orientation group
HSI: Habitat suitability index
NRMSE: Normalized root mean squared error
JYK conducted formal analysis, visualization and writing of the original draft. JKM and YJK were responsible for data curation, as well as writing, review and editing. YSP handled funding acquisition, project administration, resource management, and contributed to writing, review and editing. DK contributed to conceptualization, supervision, formal analysis, and writing, review and editing. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
This study was supported by the project title ‘Survey on Endangered Candidate Species (NIE-C-2024-103)’ funded by the Ministry of Environment.
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
View Full Text | Article as PDF |
Abstract | Google Scholar |
Print this Page | Export to Citation |
Research 2023-12-07 48:19
Physical habitat characteristics of freshwater crayfish Cambaroides similis (Koelbel, 1892) (Arthropoda, Decapoda) in South KoreaJin-Young Kim1, Yong Ju Kwon2, Ye Ji Kim2, Yeong-Deok Han1, Jung Soo Han1, Chae Hui An1, Yong Su Park1 and Dongsoo Kong2*