Journal of Ecology and Environment

pISSN 2287-8327 eISSN 2288-1220

Article

Home Article View

Research

Published online September 12, 2023
https://doi.org/10.5141/jee.23.044

Journal of Ecology and Environment (2023) 47:13

Ethnobotanical importance of the endemic taxa in the Egyptian flora

Mohamed Mahmoud El-Khalafy1* , Dalia Abd El-Azeem Ahmed2 , Kamal Hussein Shaltout2 , Soliman Abdelfattah Haroun1 and Yassin Mohamed Al-Sodany1

1Department of Botany and Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafrelsheikh 33516, Egypt
2Department of Botany and Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Tanta University, Tanta 31527, Egypt

Correspondence to:Mohamed Mahmoud El-Khalafy
E-mail mohamed_elkhalfy91@sci.kfs.edu.eg

Received: July 25, 2023; Revised: August 19, 2023; Accepted: August 19, 2023

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Background: Endemic species are important components in the flora of most world regions. Most of these species have become threatened and exposed to extinction within the last few years. The present study aims to evaluate the ecosystem services offered by the endemic plant taxa in Egypt and the threats that affect them. Twenty-five field visits were conducted during summer 2018 to spring 2022 to several locations all over Egypt. In each location, the main habitats, national distribution, abundance, goods and threats were recorded.
Results: Egypt has 41 endemic taxa belonging to 36 genera and 20 families inhabiting 10 main habitats. Rocky surfaces and sandy formations have the highest number of endemic species. The relation between the number of endemic taxa and the abundance categories indicated that 2 taxa are rare (4.9% of the total taxa), while the remaining were very rare (95%). The most represented offered good was the medicinal uses (32 taxa = 78%), while fuel plants were only represented by 2 taxa (2 taxa = 4.9%). Besides, 14 taxa (34.1% of the total studied taxa) have at least 1 environmental service. Soil fertility (7 taxa = 50%) was the most represented, followed by sand accumulations (6 taxa out of 14 taxa = 43%), while shading plant was the least (1 taxon = 7.1%) (Rosa arabica). The most represented threat is over-cutting and over-collecting (38 taxa = 92.7%), while mining and quarrying is the least represented (4 taxa = 9.8%).
Conclusions: The potential and actual goods, services and threats of the endemic taxa were assessed as follows; field observation, information collected from local inhabitants and herbalists, and a literature review. The present study recommended planning a strategy about the importance, threats and conservation of endemic taxa in Egypt that would help in the protection and rescue of these plants and increase awareness about the importance of these plants.

Keywords: ecosystem services, Egyptian flora, endemism, ethnobotanical importance, goods, threats

Endemism is a function of the spatial scale used to describe the restriction of certain taxa to a definite sized area (Laffan and Crisp 2003). The majority of endemic taxa are included in the Red Data List as they are potentially threatened due to their narrow and unique distribution ranges and habitat specificity (Crisp et al. 2001). Boulos (2009) reported 60 endemic taxa in Egypt; Hosni et al. (2013) recorded 76, while Abdelaal et al. (2018) recorded 48 taxa and El-Khalafy et al. (2021) recorded 41 endemic taxa belonged to 36 genera and 20 families.

Plants are essential resources and have an immense impact on ecosystems and a vital role in socio-economic conditions of the people (Ahmad et al. 2010; Böcük et al. 2009). Plants were universally recognized as a critical component of biodiversity and global sustainability. For example, plants provide food, fiber, fuel, shelter, and medicine. Healthy ecosystems, based on plant diversity, provide the conditions and processes that sustain life and are essential to the well-being and livelihoods of all humankind (Wilson 1992).

Natural ecosystems provide numerous services and goods that support human well-being and survival (Costanza et al. 1997; Millennium Ecosystem Assessment 2005). Deserts provide many benefits that can meet the demands of both the local inhabitants and other surrounding communities. These benefits include water, food supply, medicine and raw materials. However, the information available about the services and goods provided by this biome is fragmentary. Consequently, deserts have been over looked in most of ecosystem valuation studies (De Groot et al. 2012). A key component in desert ecosystems is the vegetation. Its structure and dynamics control the provision of ecosystem services (Havstad et al. 2007; Peters et al. 2006). Many plant and animal domestications originally occurred in the Middle-East, and many of the wild relatives of domesticated species are still extant in their centers of origin in desert areas (Batanouny 1999). However, these ancestral forms are gradually disappearing as a result of excessive resource exploitation.

Goods are organisms and their parts and products that grow in the wild and are used directly for human benefit (Daily et al. 1997). Six major categories of goods could be described identified: grazing, medicinal, human food, timber, fuel, and other uses (e.g., chairs, mats, baskets, beach beds, ornamental purposes, oil and dye extraction and soap manufacture) (Shaltout and Ahmed 2012). For example, trade of medicinal plants is an essential source of economic income in different regions of Egypt, such as the northwestern coastal region and South Sinai. The economy of the community in these regions based on this type of trade (Shaltout and Al-Sodany 2002). The respect for natural resources by Elderly people is obvious. Conversely, many of these traditional practices have been lost by the young generation. For example, the collection of fuel wood by older people is focused mainly on the dry and dead plants. In contrast, the young generation and people of the surrounding urban settlements do not differentiate between green and dry plants (Shaltout and Ahmed 2012).

Ecosystem Services are those valuable, ongoing streams of benefits provided by thriving ecosystems (Turner and Daily 2008). Twelve aspects of services could be identified (Heneidy and Bidak 2004): soil fertility, sand accumulation, esthetic concerns, wind-breaking, shading, refuge, salinity tolerance, water storage, water invading, bank retention, water purification, and weed control.

Apart from climatic changes and the loss of natural habitats, excessive human activities (e.g., overexploitation) may cause extinction to the endemic taxa (Thomas et al. 2004). Also, some essential natural threats were recorded, such as the aridity of the area with very scarce precipitation year-round. Animal grazing, human impacts, and traditional plant collection for medicinal uses, further intensify the natural threats of aridity and fragmentation, thus pushing these taxa to the extinction (Mansour et al. 2013; Zaghloul et al. 2006). In recent times, the extinction rate has accelerated, causing hundreds or perhaps thousands of species, subspecies, and varieties to become extinct every year (Cunningham and Cunningham 2006).

Endemic taxa are essential components in the flora of most world regions. Most of these species have become exposed to extinction within the last years as a result of a lot of reasons such as environmental conditions and human activities. Extinction of these species are considered as a major threat to biodiversity; there is an urgent need to assess the goods and services offered by these taxa to prepare conservation strategy for these plants. The present study aims to assess the economic uses of the endemic taxa in Egypt based on the goods (e.g., medicinal, grazing, human food, fuel, and other uses), and services (e.g., sand accumulation, soil fertility, nitrogen fixation, and ruderal weed), which they offer. Besides, the determination of different threats affects them.

Study area

Egypt lies in the northeastern part of Africa and extends to Asia (Sinai Peninsula). Egypt is the aridest country in North Africa in which desert conditions prevail throughout the country (Wickens 1992). Egypt contains four main geographical regions (Fig. 1): the Western Desert, including the Mediterranean coastal belt (681,000 km2), the Eastern Desert, including the Red Sea coastal belt (223,000 km2), Nile land (25,000 km2) and Sinai Peninsula (61,000 km2). River Nile land includes several islands in its mainstream and the two Delta branches. Fayium depression (1,700 km2) is connected to the Nile by a principal irrigation canal called the Youssef Sea (Zahran and Willis 2009).

Figure 1. The main geomorphic regions of Egypt.

The climate of Egypt is governed by its position in the North-eastern part of Africa between 22º–32º N (El-Hadidi 2000). Its climate is generally moderate, considered as a contest between the hot, dry air masses over the Sahara, and the cooler, damper maritime air masses from the north carried by eastward moving depressions. The hot dry tropical continental air masses dominate throughout most of the year, but during the winter period, air masses of both tropical and polar maritime origin make brief incursions into Egypt from the north, frequently bringing rain with them. A hot and almost rainless climate characterizes it. The key feature of the precipitation in Egypt is very little and the average annual rainfall over the whole country is only about 10 mm. Even along the narrow northern strip of the Mediterranean coastal land, where the precipitation is concentrated, the annual rainfall range between 80–200 mm year-1 from 2015 to 2019 (https://power.larc.nasa.gov/), and the amount decreases very rapidly southward.

Twenty-five field visits were conducted during summer 2018 to spring 2022 to several locations all over Egypt, including Saint-Catherine, Matrouh, Alexandria, Aswan and Assiut for collecting the endemic taxa in Egypt (Table 1 and Fig. 2). In each location, specimens of the taxa were collected from different sites. The main habitats in each location were determined through visiting different sites. The available information and data are also collected: coordinates, abundance, uses and threats for taxa through visits. Other notifications were taken into consideration such national phytogeographical distribution.

Table 1 . Field visits during the present study (summer 2018–spring 2022).

LocationExact placeDate
Elsheikh Mubarak VillageBaltim08/4/2019
09/4/2019
15/2/2021
AlaminOmayed region19/4/2019
20/4/2019
16/6/2020
28/3/2022
Saint Catherine ProtectorateShag Shreg04/5/2019
19/5/2020
Wadi Faraa04/5/2019
19/5/2020
Wadi Garginya05/5/2019
19/5/2020
Wadi El-Arbain20/5/2020
Wadi Abo-Welih20/5/2020
Wadi Aukdid Eldib07/5/2019
Wadi Gebal (Tobok)07/5/2019
Wadi Gebal07/5/2019
Wadi Zawatine08/5/2019
Wadi Rahabet Nada08/5/2019
Sheg El Kharaza09/5/2019
Sheg.Etlah and W.Etlah09/5/2019
ElRasis10/5/2019
Wadi Abo-Hamman10/5/2019
Eldir Mountain region11/5/2019
Wadi Feiran5/4/2019
Abu Gifa4/9/2020
Main Shikaya4/9/2020
Wadi El-Shaq4/9/2020
Gebel Azeg5/9/2020
Wadi El-Mather5/9/2020
El-Mserdy6/9/2020
Wadi Abumahshour6/9/2020
Gebel Al-Ahmar7/9/2020
Alamin-MatrouhAgeeba and Keliopatra30/3/2018
13/6/2020
29/3/2022
29/5/2022
El-Gharam region31/3/2018
13/6/2020
29/3/2022
28/5/2022
Omayed region4/6/2018
13/6/2020
29/3/2022
25/5/2022
Wadi Habis4/6/2018
13/6/2020
29/3/2022
30/5/2022
Wadi El-Agol30/3/2022
Ras-Elhekhma5/6/2018
13/6/2020
30/3/2022
Sidi-Abdelrahman13/6/2020
5/6/2018
30/3/2022
27/5/2022
Alamin-Sidi Abdelrahman Road28/3/2022
Matrouh El-Sallum Road31/3/2022
OasisSiwa Oasis31/3/2022
Burg ElburullusBurg Elburullus6/6/2018
15/2/2021
El-Sallam TownEl-Tawfiqia7/5/2022
Alexandria (Mariut)Bremly cage29/3/2018
13/6/2020
28/3/2022
Near Burg El-Arab stadium29/3/2018
13/6/2020
28/3/2022
Mariut entrance28/3/2022
Bashari El-kheir28/3/2022
Mariut28/3/2022
El-Ghabaniat28/3/2022
Burg El-Arab28/3/2022
El-SharqiaEl-Salhia14/10/2021
6/5/2022
Baltim–Rashid RoadBaltim–Rashid Road5/6/2021
Gamasa–Baltim RoadGamasa–Baltim Road5/6/2021
5/5/2022
FayoumWadi Al-Hitan, North Fayoum5/4/2020
Red SeaEl-Mallaha Swamp
Mangrove Forests, Safag
28/3/2020
29/3/2020
Sharm ElsheikhRas Muhammad Nature Reserve7/4/2019
AssiutWadi Al-Assiuty Protectorate6/9/2019
El-BeheiraIdku3/5/2022
KafrelsheikhDessouk
Dessouk-Motoubis road
Gebel Abu Mandour
1/2/2020
1/2/2020
2/2/2020
2/5/2022

Figure 2. Map of Egypt indicating the field trips and distribution of endemic taxa.

The identification of collected plants carried by authors and based on different literatures and database reviews and recorded species are arranged alphapitically according to Linear Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (LAPG) III System. These resources include previous floras and available literature: Täckholm et al. (1941), Täckholm and Drar (1950–1969), Andrews (1950–1956), Hassib (1951), Täckholm (1974), El-Hadidi et al. (1992), Boulos (1999, 2000, 2002, 2005, 2009), El-Hadidi and Hosni (2000), Zahram and Willis (2003), Ahmed (2009), Shaltout et al. (2010), Shabana (2013), Zahran et al. (2015), Ibrahim et al. (2016), and El-Khalafy (2018).

Goods and services of the recorded taxa were assessed on three bases; information collected from local inhabitants and herbalists, field observations and the literature reviews. Sixty persons distributed in different regions all over Egypt were interviewed; they are in the age class of 40–60 years old (Table S1). Additional information was collected from herb shops distributed in other regions especially in Matrouh, Siwa, Nile Delta. A literature review was used to fill gaps in the collected information: Boulos (1983), El-Hadidi et al. (1992), Aly (1998), Batanouny (1999, 2005), 2005, Shaltout and Al-Sodany (2002), Ali (2004), Ahmed (2009), Shaltout and Ahmed (2012), Shaltout et al. (2010), Hatim (2013), Bidak et al. (2015), Heneidy et al. (2017), El-Khalafy (2018), Ahmed et al. (2023), and El-Khalafy (2023).

All of the endemic taxa were exposed to at least one aspect of threats. The threats are classified into 8 major groups: over-collecting and over-cutting, habitat loss, browsing and over-grazing, clearance for agriculture, mining and quarrying, trampling, urbanization and tourism and climatic changes and environmental conditions. Major threats for each taxon were assessed in the field and by using the website (http://www.iucnredlist.org/technical-documents/classification-schemes/threats-classification-scheme) and depending on the following studies: Hosni et al. (2013), Shabana (2013), Zahran et al. (2015), Rabei et al. (2016), Shaltout et al. (2018), Omar and Nagy (2015), The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (2017a, 2017b, 2017c), Omar et al. (2017), Omar (2018).

Habitat types and abundance categories

According to the habitats of endemic taxa, the recorded taxa variation revealed that rocky surfaces and sandy formations have the highest number of taxa (Table 2). The relation between the frequencies of endemic taxa in the Egyptian flora in relation to the number of habitats in which they occur, approximates an inverse J-shape distribution. There is a gradual decrease in the number of taxa with an increase in the number of habitats, starting with the taxa that occur in one habitat (34 taxa = 82.9%) and two habitats (6 taxa = 14.6%). Allium mareoticum is the only taxon that occurs in four habitats.

Table 2 . Taxonomic diversity of the endemic taxa in Egypt in relation to their habitats.

HabitatTaxonomic category
FamilyGenusSpeciesSubspeciesvariety
Banks of water bodies5541-
Desert plains, depressions, and wadis46411
Sandy formations7121113
Alluvial and loamy soils111--
Cultivated fields444--
Mountains and hills444--
Rocky surfaces79912
Well surroundings2311-
Road sides111--
Calcareous ground221-1

-: not applicable.



In addition, the relation between the number of endemic taxa and the abundance categories indicated that 2 taxa are rare (4.9% of the total taxa), while 39 were very rare (95.1%) (Fig. 3).

Figure 3. Number of endemic taxa in the Egyptian flora in relation to their abundance categories (magnitude terms). cc: very common; c: common; r: rare; rr: very rare.

Goods and services

All the endemic taxa have at least one aspect of the potential or actual economic goods (Table S2). The goods are classified into 5 major groups: medicinal, grazing, human food, fuel and other uses (e.g., esthetic concerns, oil). The offered goods could be arranged descendingly as follows: medicinal (32 taxa = 78%), grazing (19 taxa = 46.3%), human food (9 taxa = 22%), other uses (6 taxa = 14.6%) and fuel (2 taxa = 4.9%) (Fig. 4A). Seventeen taxa have only one good (34.1%), while 21 taxa have two goods (51.2%) and only one taxon has three goods (2.4%) (Fig. 4B). Regarding the habitat’s types, medicinal plants had the maximum value in sandy formations, while grazing and human food in rocky surfaces (Table 3).

Table 3 . Goods offered by the endemic taxa in the Egyptian flora in relation to their habitats.

HabitatGoods
MEGRHFFUOT
Sandy formations17a92-2a
Rocky surfaces54a22a-
Mountains and hills421-1
Calcareous ground211--
Desert plains, depressions, and wadis523a-2a
Cultivated fields123a-1
Banks of water bodies421--
Alluvial soils1----
Road sides112--
Well surroundings21--1

ME: medicinal; GR: grazing; HF: human food; FU: fuel; OT: other uses; -: not applicable.

aMaximum values.


Figure 4. Descending arrangement of the goods of the endemic taxa in the Egyptian flora (A) and the number of goods offered by endemic taxa (B). ME: medicinal; GR: grazing; HF: human food; OT: other uses; FU: fuel.

Regarding the habitats types, medicinal plants had the maximum value in sandy formations, while grazing and human food in rocky surfaces. The variation in relation to national geographical distribution indicated that all goods had the maximum values in Sinai, followed by Mediterranean region (Table 4).

Table 4 . Goods offered by the endemic taxa in the Egyptian flora in relation to their phytogeographical region.

Geographic regionGoods
MEGRHFFUOT
Sinai16a10a4a2a1
Mediterranean854a-2a
Eastern desert322-2a
Western desert11---
Nile753--
Gebel Elba22--1
Oases2-1--
Red Sea coastal strip1----

ME: medicinal; GR: grazing; HF: human food; FU: fuel; OT: other uses; -: not applicable.

aMaximum values.



Fourteen species has at least one environmental service. According to the available data in the present study, most services offered by the endemic taxa in Egypt are soil fertility and nitrogen fixation (7 taxa = 50%) and sand accumulation (6 taxa out of 14 taxa = 43% of the total environmental services recorded species), weed (2 taxa = 14.3%) and shading (1 taxon = 7.1%) (Table S2).

Threats

The threats upon the endemic taxa could be arranged descendingly as follows: over-collecting and over-cutting (33 taxa = 80.5%), climatic changes and environmental conditions (22 taxa = 53.6%), urbanization and tourism (19 taxa = 46.3%), browsing and over-grazing (20 taxa = 48.8%), clearance for agriculture (16 taxa = 39%), habitat loss (14 taxa = 34.1%), mining and quarrying (7 taxa = 17%) (Fig. 5A). The variation according to the number of threats indicated that 4 taxa are exposed to one threat, 7 to 2 threats, 14 to 3 threats (34.1%), 11 to 4 threats (26.9%), 4 to 5 threats (9.6%) and only one taxon (Hyoscyamus boveanus) exposed to 6 threats (2.4%) (Fig. 5B and Table S3).

Figure 5. Descending arrangement of the threats affect on the endemic taxa in the Egyptian flora (A) and the number of threats affects endemic taxa (B). 1: overcutting and over-collecting; 2: climatic changes and environmental conditions; 3: browsing and overgrazing; 4: urbanization and tourism; 5: clearance for agriculture; 6: habitat loss; 7: trampling; 8: mining and quarrying.

Endemism is the restriction of occurrence of a taxon to a defined country (Gaston 1994). The narrow-distributed taxa restricted to a limited area in the country are steno-endemics (Gaston 1994). Forty-one endemic taxa of vascular plants belonged to 36 genera and 20 families were recorded in the present study. All of the endemics had at least one aspect of the potential or actual economic goods. The most represented offered good was the medicinal uses (78%), while fuel plants were only represented by 2 taxa (4.9%). The results of the present study are similar to that of other studies in different countries. For example, El-Darier and El-Mogaspi (2009) recorded 44 endemic species belonging to 28 families and 41 genera in El-Jabal El-Akhdar Region (Libya). The most represented goods were medicinal uses. Twenty one medicinal uses were recorded for 12 species mentioned in the present study and 7 non-medicinal uses were also mentioned. Most cited plant parts used for medicinal purposes were flowers, leaves and tubers. Majid et al. (2019) recorded 38 endemic plant species belonging to nineteen families which were utilized by the local inhabitants in Lesser Himalayan region of Pakistan. The highest number of endemics was with medicinal uses. The highest number of endemics was used in fever, wound healing, throat infection and tonic (4 species each). Root was the most widely used part (36.17%) in cure of diseases and the leading mode administered was decoction (25.49%). Heneidy et al. (2017) showed ethnobotanical importance and conservation value of native plants in eastern Arabian Peninsula. Their results showed that native plants provide many ecological and socioeconomic services, including the provisioning of food, medicine, and energy. The native species (>77%) were reported to potentially be used for more than 170 therapeutic applications and for curing various human ailments. The prevailing habitats, namely coastal plains, saline flats, rocky ground and non-saline inlands, were generally characterized by low vegetation cover and low species richness. These native species has high ecological value, providing many ecological services. The most prominent of the recorded ecological services provided by the native plants in the region included sand fixation (68%), salt tolerance (30.7%), contribution to soil fertility (25.3%), water storage (20%), and refuge (9.3%). In addition, the majority of the species recorded are used as grazing plants (96%). A considerable proportion of the species (33%) are consumed by local inhabitants either cooked, as condiments, or added as greens to salads. Moreover, about 25% of the plant species recorded were reported as of value as a fuel-wood. Finally, out of the 75 native plants species recorded, 60 species were reported to be of medicinal value. The medicinal plants were reported to be used for more than 170 therapeutic uses and for curing different kinds of human ailments. In addition, Baydoun et al. (2017) revealed that 130 plant species provide the local community with a breadth of wood and non-wood products in Jabal Moussa Bioreserve, Lebanon. Medicinal species ranked highest contributing to 33% of reported use followed by food and beverage (15%), fuel (12%), environmental uses (10%) and materials (8%), while the remaining 22% was shared between other uses (bee plants, poisons, cosmetics, and social uses).

Medicinal goods

Thirty-three endemics (79% of the total good taxa) are of medicinal uses. For example, the leaves and flowering tops of Origanum syriacum var. synaicum were collected and used to treat pulmonary diseases, ease sore throats and treat asthma and bronchitis (Batanouny 1999). The flowers and leaves of Rosa arabica were used as an analgesic for menstrual pain; it also has an ethno-veterinary use; the whole plant was used for treatment of some reproductive disorders in sheep, goats and camels (Pieroni et al. 2006). N-hexane and ethylacetate extract of aerial parts of Silene schimperiana showed significant cytotoxicity against colon carcinoma and liver carcinoma cells (Hussein et al. 2017). Six metabolites were extracted from the aerial parts of Anarrhinum pubescens which show cytotoxic activity the human lung carcinoma cell line (Mahran et al. 2019). Several iridoids were isolated from A. pubescens. These iridoids were considered as natural curatives for neurodegenerative disorders like Alzheimer’s disease (Mahran et al. 2020). In addition, the methanol extracts of this plant have shown slight cytotoxic activities against numerous diseases like breast, colon, hepatocellular and lung tumor cell lines (Moustafa et al. 2014). It has been found that Buffonia multiceps has an ethnoveterinary use. The whole plant of B. multiceps used for treatment of digestive problems in sheep, goats and equines (Pieroni et al. 2006). The flowers of H. boveanus are mixed with tobacco (Nicotiana sp.) and smoked for its intoxicating effects (Omar et al. 2017). Silene leucophylla is used to treat leprosy, diarrhea, heal cuts and inflamed wounds; root show hepato-protective function (Omar et al. 2017). Ballota species have been used in Turkish folk medicine as antiulcer, antispasmodic, diuretic, choleretic, anti haemorrhoidal, and sedative agent (Omar et al. 2017). Sesquiterpene lactones were isolated from Sonchus macrocarpus which have medical importance (Mahmoud et al. 1984). Moreover, Fumaria species have Anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, antifungal, antinematode and antinociceptive effects (Gupta et al. 2012). Antiviral, antibacterial, antifungal, antidiabetic, anticarcinogenic, antiplatelet, antispasmodic, antiseptic, antihelminthic, antithrombotic, anti-asthmatic, anti-carminative, anti-oxidant, anti-inflammatory, antihypertensive, hypoglycemic, hypotensive, lithontripic, and hypocholesterolemic properties are just a few of the health benefits that Allium species reported to provide (Najeebullah et al. 2021). Further, roots and bulbs of Bellevalia species stated to have anti-rheumatic and anti-inflammatory effects (Savio et al. 2019). Furthermore, P. arabicum contains Steroids. This phytochemical group has anti-microbials, detoxifyingagents, strengthners, anti-rheumatics and anti-malarial,hepaticidal activities (Koche et al. 2016). Indeed, the reason for the linkage between tannins, carbohydrates, and resins in P. arabicum is that they can form reversible and irreversible complexes with each other. Plant extracts with tannins are used as astringents to treat and prevent diarrhoea, as well as diuretics that are effective against stomach and duodenal cancers and pharmaceuticals that are anti-inflammatory, antiseptic, antioxidant, and homeostatic pharmaceuticals (Bruyne et al. 1999).

Grazing goods

Silene oreosinaica was exposed to grazing by domestic and wild animals (Rabei et al. 2016). Buffonia muticeps was exposed to destructive overgrazing, causing loss of reproductive organs (The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2017b). Also, has economic importance in grazing processes as a pastoral plant (Khafagi et al. 2012; Omar et al. 2013). Anarrhinum pubescens considere as a pastoral plant (Khafagi et al. 2012; Omar et al. 2013; The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2017a). Micromeria serbaliana has grazing economic use (Omar et al. 2017). Silene leucophylla is highly grazed by domestic animals (Omar et al. 2017). Polygala sinaica var. sinaica has economic importance in grazing processes as a pastoral plant (Khafagi et al. 2012; Omar et al. 2013). Veronica anagalloides subsp. taeckholmiorum, and Atractylis carduus var. marmarica, Bromus aegyptiacus, and S. macrocarpus have economic importance in grazing processes (Ahmed 2009).

Human food and fuel goods

Anarrhinum pubescens is collected for traditional treatment and fuel by local communities on a small scale (Moustafa et al. 2014). Also, R. arabica is over cutting for fuel (The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2017c). Allium mareoticum, Melilotus serratifolius, and S. macrocarpus are used as human food by local inhabitants (Ahmed 2009). In addition, A. carduus var. marmarica was collected for traditional treatment and fuel by local communities (Shaltout and Ahmed 2012). Common garlic and onions, two economically major Allium crop species, play a large role in the daily diet as vegetables and for therapeutic purposes (Najeebullah et al. 2021).

Threats

Habitat destruction is one of the major threats which threatened many endemics in the Egyptian Flora, especially in the Mediterranean region (Shaltout and Ahmed 2012). Fifteen endemics in the present study (e.g., A. mareoticum, Pancratium arabicum, and S. macrocarpus) were exposed to habitat loss due to urbanization and tourism, clearance for agriculture and construction processes. These activities have not only led to the destruction of the habitats, but also the degradation of vast areas of habitat surrounding them. Also, 4 endemics (e.g., Dianthus guessfeldtianus, Helianthemum schweinfurthii, and H. boveanus) were damaged during mining and quarrying; one of the significant processes causing degradation in the ecosystems of many Egyptian regions due to destruction of plant cover. Besides, 22 endemics were threatened as a result of climatic changes in the form of hyper-aridity of most of the Egyptian Deserts (Bidak et al. 2015).

In the present study, it was observed that B. multiceps and A. pubescens are among the highly grazed endemic taxa in Saint Kathrine Protectorate. Silene leucophyllais exposed to grazing by sheep and goats, as well as over-collection for scientific research (Saker et al. 2011). Bufonia multiceps is stressed by over grazing due to their high palatability by domestic animals (El-Husseini et al. 2008).

Thirty-seven endemics are subjected to over-cutting and over-collecting by local inhabitants, herbalists, and scientific researchers. The collection of wild native medicinal plants for commercial trade has no regulation. The most serious aspect of this practice is that it usually targets rare and localized flora leading to damage them further (Ahmed 2009; Bidak et al. 2015).

The vegetation within the saint Katrine protectorate area has been subjected to disturbance through human activities including “overgrazing, uprooting” (Khafagi et al. 2012; Mosallam 2007). The threat from feral donkeys causes destruction to numerous plant species through trampling (Khafaja et al. 2006). Also, plant taxa in this region are severely affected by climatic changes, specifically through the destructive effect of sudden flooding (uprooting), and the long term drought impact. In general, these taxa are severely threatened by both natural (aridity of the area and climate change) and human factors (over-grazing: domestic animals & feral donkeys, over collection, unmanaged scientific research). These threats impact numerous plants like (A. pubescens, B. muticeps, H. boveanus, B. kaiseri, Micromeria serbaliana, O. syriacum subsp. sinaicum, P. sinaica var. sinaica, Primula boveana, S. leucophylla, S. oreosinaica, S. shimperiana, and R. arabica (Omar 2014, 2018; Omar et al. 2017; The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2017a, 2017b, 2017c).

Also some endemic taxa have difficulties in reproducing a new generation. Overgrazing cause destruction of the reproductive organs of A. pubescens and decrease the opportunity for the possibility of producing new generation (Omar and Nagy 2015).

This study was based entirely upon the economic use of endemic plants in Egypt. In the present study, data were categorized into five categories based on the uses of plants. The medicinal category was the most represented (32 taxa), followed by grazing (19 taxa), human food (9 taxa), other uses (6 taxa = 14.6 %) and fuel (2 taxa = 4.9 %). According to the habitats of endemic taxa, the recorded taxa variation revealed that rocky surfaces and sandy formations have the highest number of taxa. Fourteen species has at least one environmental service. According to the available data, most services offered by the endemic taxa in Egypt are soil fertility, nitrogen fixation and sand accumulation. The threats upon the endemic taxa could be arranged descendingly as follows: over-collecting and over-cutting (33 taxa), climatic changes and environmental conditions (22 taxa), urbanization and tourism (19 taxa), browsing and over- grazing (20 taxa), clearance for agriculture (16 taxa), habitat loss (14 taxa), mining and quarrying (7 taxa). The useful plants in Egyptian Flora need urgent attention especially endemic species.

Supplementary information accompanies this paper at https://doi.org/10.5141/jee.23.044.

Table S1. Example of inquiry sample about the goods of endemic taxa in Egypt. Table S2. Characteristics of the endemic taxa in the Egyptian flora. Table S3. Type of threats upon the endemic taxa in the Egyptian flora.

jee-47-13-supple.pdf

MMEK, DAEAA, KHS, YMAS involved in conception and design, acquisition, analysis, statistical analysis and interpretation of results, drafting the article and revising it, and approved the final version to be submitted for publication. SAH involved in conception and interpretation of results, revising the article and approved the final version to be submitted for publication.

  1. Abdelaal M, Fois M, Fenu G, Bacchetta G. Critical checklist of the endemic vascular plants of Egypt. Phytotaxa. 2018;360(1):19-34. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.360.1.2.
    CrossRef
  2. Ahmed DA. Current situation of the flora and vegetation of the Western Mediterranean Desert of Egypt [PhD dissertation]. Tanta: Tanta University; 2009.
    CrossRef
  3. Ahmed DA, El-Khalafy MM, Almushghub F, Sharaf El-Din A, Shaltout K. Ethnobotanical importance of wild plants in Wadi Kaam, Northwestern Libya. Egypt J Bot. 2023;63(3):797-812.
    CrossRef
  4. Ahmad I, Ahmad MSA, Hussain M, Ashraf M, Ashraf MY, Hameed M. Spatiotemporal aspects of plant community structure in open scrub rangelands of sub-mountainous Himalayan Plateaus. Pak J Bot. 2010;42(5):3431-40.
  5. Ali M. On the ecology of Sinai Peninsula [MSc Thesis]. Mansoura: Mansoura University; 2004.
  6. Aly A. Atlas of plant flora dominating the North West Coast Region of Egypt. Regional council for research and extinction. Cairo: French Side Fund; 1998.
  7. Andrews FW. The flowering plants of the Anglo-Egyptian Sudan. Arbroath: Published for the Sudan Govt. by T Buncle; 1950-1956.
  8. Batanouny KH. Wild medicinal plants in Egypt: an inventory to support conservation and sustainable use. Cairo: Palm Press; 1999.
  9. Batanouny KH. Encyclopaedia of wild medicinal plants in Egypt. Conservation and sustainable use of medicinal plants in arid and semi- arid ecosystems in Egypt. Cairo: Palm Press; 2005.
  10. Baydoun SA, Kanj D, Raafat K, Aboul Ela M, Chalak L, Arnold-Apostolides N. Ethnobotanical and economic importance of wild plant species of Jabal Moussa Bioreserve, Lebanon. J Ecosyst Ecograph. 2017;7(3):245-52. https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7625.1000245.
    CrossRef
  11. Bidak LM, Kamal SA, Halmy MWA, Heneidy SZ. Goods and services provided by native plants in desert ecosystems: examples from the northwestern coastal desert of Egypt. Glob Ecol Conserv. 2015;3:433-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2015.02.001.
    CrossRef
  12. Böcük H, Türe C, Ketenoğlu O. Plant diversity and conservation of the northeast Phrygia Region under the impact of land degradation and desertification (Central Anatolia, Turkey). Pak J Bot. 2009;41(5):2305-21.
  13. Boulos L. Medicinal plants of North Africa. Algonac: Reference Publications, Inc.; 1983.
  14. Boulos L. Flora of Egypt. Cairo: Al-Hadara Publishing; 1999, 2000, 2002, 2005.
  15. Boulos L. Flora of Egypt checklist - revised annotated edition. Cairo: Al-Hadara Publishing; 2009.
  16. Bruyne T, Pieters L, Deelstra H, Vlietinck A. Condensed vegetable tannins: biodiversity in structure and biological activities. Biochem Syst Ecol. 1999;27(4):445-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-1978(98)00101-X.
    CrossRef
  17. Costanza R, d'Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature. 1997;387:253-60. https://doi.org/10.1038/387253a0.
    CrossRef
  18. Crisp MD, Laffan S, Linder HP, Monro A. Endemism in the Australian flora. J Biogeogr. 2001;28(2):183-98. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2699.2001.00524.x.
    CrossRef
  19. Cunningham WP, Cunningham MA. Principles of environmental science: inquiry and applications. 3rd ed. Dubuque: McGraw-Hill; 2006.
    CrossRef
  20. Daily GC, Alexander S, Ehrlich PR, Goulder L, Lubchenco J, Matson PA, et al. Ecosystem services: benefits supplied to human societies by natural ecosystems. Washington, DC: Ecological Society of America; 1997.
    CrossRef
  21. De Groot R, Brander L, Ploeg S, Costanza R, Bernard F, Braat L, et al. Global estimates of the value of ecosystems and their services in monetary units. Ecosyst Serv. 2012;1(1):50-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.005.
    CrossRef
  22. El-Darier SM, El-Mogaspi FM. Ethnobotany and relative importance of some endemic plant species at El-Jabal El-Akhdar region (Libya). World J Agric Sci. 2009;5(3):353-60.
  23. El-Hadidi M. Geomorphology, climate and phytogeographic affinities. In: El-Hadidi MN, editor. Flora Aegyptiaca, vol. Cairo: Palm Press; 2000.
  24. El-Hadidi M, Hosni H. Conservation and threats. In: El-Hadidi MN, editor. Flora Aegyptiaca, vol. Cairo: Palm Press; 2000. p. 105-80.
  25. El-Hadidi M, Abd El-Ghani M, Fahmy A. The plant red data book of Egypt, 1. Cairo: Palm Press and Cairo University Herbarium; 1992.
  26. El-Husseini N, Abd El-Ghani MM, El-Naggar SI. Biogeography and diversity of the tubiflorae in Egypt. Pol Bot J. 2008;53(2):105-25.
  27. El-Khalafy MM. Red list of the endemic and near endemic plant species in Egypt [MSc Thesis]. Tanta: Tanta University; 2018.
  28. El-Khalafy MM, Ahmed DA, Shaltout KH, Al-Sodany YM, Haroun SA. Re-assessment of the endemic taxa in the Egyptian Flora. Afr J Ecol. 2021;59(3):784-96. https://doi.org/10.1111/aje.12880.
    CrossRef
  29. Gaston KJ. Rarity. London: Chapman & Hall; 1994.
    CrossRef
  30. Gupta PC, Sharma N; Rao ChV. A review on ethnobotany, phytochemistry and pharmacology of Fumaria indica (Fumitory). Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 2012;2(8):665-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2221-1691(12)60117-8.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  31. Hassib M. Distribution of plant communities in Egypt. Bull Fac Sc Fouad I Univ. 1951;29:59-258.
  32. Hatim M. An inventory of available phytosociological data of Sinai and field survey of some under sampeled area [MSc Thesis]. Tanta: Tanta University; 2013.
  33. Havstad KM, Peters DPC, Skaggs R, Brown J, Bestelmeyer B, Fredrickson E, et al. Ecological services to and from rangelands of the United States. Ecol Econ. 2007;64(2):261-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.08.005.
    CrossRef
  34. Heneidy SZ, Bidak LM. Potential uses of plant species of the coastal Mediterranean region, Egypt. Pak J Biol Sci. 2004;7(6):1010-23. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2004.1010.1023.
    CrossRef
  35. Heneidy SZ, Halmy MWA, Bidak LM. The ethnobotanical importance and conservation value of native plants in eastern Arabian Peninsula. Feddes Repert. 2017;128(3-4):105-28. https://doi.org/10.1002/fedr.201600024.
    CrossRef
  36. Hosni H, Hosny A, Shamso E, Hamdy R. Endemic and near-endemic taxa in the flora of Egypt. Egypt J Bot. 2013;53(2):357-83.
  37. Hussein IA, Mohammad AEI, El-Hela AA. Chemical and biological characterize of some silene species growing in Egypt. World J Pharm Res. 2017;6(14):184-97.
  38. Ibrahim K, Hosni HA, Peterson PM. Grasses of Egypt. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Scholarly Press; 2016.
    CrossRef
  39. Khafagi OMA, Hatab EE, Omar KA. Challenges towards Hypericum sinaicum conservation in south Sinai, Egypt. Jordan J Biol Sci. 2012;6(2):117-26.
    CrossRef
  40. Khafaja T, Hatab A, Dsouki A. Report on the current situation of the plant vegetation cover in the high mountain area of Saint Katherine. Plant Conservation and Monitoring Programme. Sinai: Saint Katherine Protectorate; 2006.
  41. Koche D, Shirsat R, Kawale M. An overerview of major classes of phytochemicals: their types and role in disease prevention. Hislopia J. 2016;9(1-2):1-11.
  42. Laffan SW, Crisp MD. Assessing endemism at multiple spatial scales, with an example from the Australian vascular flora. J Biogeogr. 2003;30(4):511-20. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2699.2003.00875.x.
    CrossRef
  43. Mahmoud Z, El-Masry S, Amer M, Ziesche J, Grenz M. Sesquiterpene lactones from Sonchus macrocarpus. 1984;23(5):1105-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9422(00)82619-9.
    CrossRef
  44. Mahran E, Morlock GE, Keusgen M. Guided isolation of new iridoid glucosides from Anarrhinum pubescens by high-performance thin-layer chromatography-acetylcholinesterase assay. J Chromatogr A. 2020;1609:460438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2019.460438.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  45. Mahran E, Hosny M, El-Hela A, Boroujerdi A. New iridoid glycosides from Anarrhinum pubescens. Nat Prod Res. 2019;33(21):3057-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786419.2018.1516659.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  46. Majid A, Ahmad H, Saqib Z, Rahman IU, Khan U, Alam J, et al. Exploring threatened traditional knowledge; ethnomedicinal studies of rare endemic flora from Lesser Himalayan region of Pakistan. Rev Bras Farmacogn. 2019;29(6):785-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjp.2019.03.005.
    CrossRef
  47. Mansour H, Jiménez A, Keller B, Nowak MD, Conti E. Development of 13 microsatellite markers in the endangered Sinai primrose (Primula boveana, Primulaceae). Appl Plant Sci. 2013;1(6):1200515. https://doi.org/10.3732/apps.1200515.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  48. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press; 2005.
    CrossRef
  49. Mosallam HAM. Assessment of target species in Saint Katherine protectorate, Sinai, Egypt. J Appl Sci Res. 2007;3(6):456-69.
  50. Moustafa SMA, Menshawi BM, Wassel GM, Mahmoud K, Mounier MM. Screening of some plants in Egypt for their cytotoxicity against four human cancer cell lines. Int J Pharmtech Res. 2014;6(3):1074-84.
  51. Najeebullah S, Shinwari ZK, Jan SA, Khan I, Ali M. Ethno-medicinal and phytochemical properties of genus allium: a review of recent advances. Pak J Bot. 2021;53(1):135-44. https://doi.org/10.30848/PJB2021-1(34).
    KoreaMed CrossRef
  52. Omar K. Assessing the conservation status of the Sinai Primrose (Primula boveana). Middle East J Sci Res. 2014;21(7):1027-36.
  53. Omar KA. 2017 final report: long-term conservation planning for endemic plant species in Egypt. Benha: Conservation Leadership Programme; 2018.
  54. Omar K, Nagy A. Summary report on the visit of St. Catherine Protected Area. Cairo: Nature Conservation Sector, Ministry of Environment & Strengthening Protected Area Financing and Management Systems Project; 2015.
  55. Omar K, Khafagi O, Elkholy MA. Geomatics and plant conservation: GIS for best conservation planning. London: LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing; 2013.
  56. Omar KA, Elgamal I, Shalof A, Mehana S, Abdelbaset F. 2017 final report: community-based conservation of threatened plants Silene shimperiana and Polygala sinaica in South Sinai, Egypt. Catherine: The Rufford Foundation; 2017.
  57. Peters DPC, Bestelmeyer BT, Herrick JE, Fredrickson EL, Monger HC, Havstad KM. Disentangling complex landscapes: new insights into arid and semiarid system dynamics. BioScience. 2006;56(6):491-501. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2006)56[491:dclnii]2.0.co;2.
    CrossRef
  58. Pieroni A, Giusti ME, de Pasquale C, Lenzarini C, Censorii E, Gonzáles-Tejero MR, et al. Circum-Mediterranean cultural heritage and medicinal plant uses in traditional animal healthcare: a field survey in eight selected areas within the RUBIA project. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 2006;2:16. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4269-2-16.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  59. Rabei SH, Nada RM, Gamal IAEL. Bio-systematic study on the endemic Silene oreosinaica Chowdhuri from Sinai, Egypt. Sci J Damietta Fac Sci. 2016;6(2):183-8. https://doi.org/10.21608/sjdfs.2016.194760.
    CrossRef
  60. Saker M, El-Demerdash M, Allam MA. In vitro propagation and genetic characterization as effective tools for conservation of Silene leucophylla, grown in St. Katherine Protected Area, Sinai, Egypt. J Genet Eng Biotechnol. 2011;9(1):21-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgeb.2011.05.011.
    CrossRef
  61. Savio M, Ibrahim MF, Scarlata C, Orgiu M, Accardo G, Sardar AS, et al. Anti-inflammatory properties of Bellevalia saviczii root extract and its isolated homoisoflavonoid (Dracol) are mediated by modification on calcium signaling. Molecules. 2019;24(18):3376. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24183376.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  62. Shabana H. Variability among Phlomis aurea Decne. Populations in Southern Sinai [MSc Thesis]. Tanta: Tanta University; 2013.
  63. Shaltout K, Ahmed DA. Ecosystem services of the flora of Southern Mediterranean Desert of Egypt. Ethnobot Res Appl. 2012;10:403-22.
  64. Shaltout K, Ahmed D, Diab M, El-Khalafy M. Re-assessment of the near-endemic taxa in the Egyptian flora. Taeckholmia. 2018;38:61-83. https://taec.journals.ekb.eg/article_11903.html.
    CrossRef
  65. Shaltout KH, Al-Sodany YM. Phytoecology of Omayed Site. Cairo: Mediterranean West Coast Project, Egyptian Environmental Affairs Agency; 2002.
    CrossRef
  66. Shaltout KH, El-Din AS, Ahmed DA. Plant life in the Nile Delta. Tanta: Tanta University Press; 2010.
    CrossRef
  67. Täckholm V. Student's flora of Egypt. 2nd ed. Beirut: Cairo University; 1974.
    CrossRef
  68. Täckholm V, Drar M. Flora of Egypt: volume II, III, VI. Cairo: Bulletin of the Faculty of Science, Fuoad I University; 1950.
    CrossRef
  69. Täckholm V, Täckholm G, Drar M. Flora of Egypt: volume I. Cairo: Fouad I University; 1941.
    CrossRef
  70. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2017. Anarrhinum pubescens. 2017a. https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/84119796/84119800. Accessed 3 Mar 2023.
  71. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2017. Bufonia multiceps. 2017b. https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/84119945/84119949. Accessed 3 Mar 2023.
  72. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2017. Rosa arabica. 2017c. https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/84120072/84120074. Accessed 3 Mar 2023.
  73. Thomas CD, Cameron A, Green RE, Bakkenes M, Beaumont LJ, Collingham YC, et al. Extinction risk from climate change. Nature. 2004;427(6970):145-8. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02121.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  74. Turner RK, Daily GC. The ecosystem services framework and natural capital conservation. Environ Resour Econ. 2008;39(1):25-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-007-9176-6.
    CrossRef
  75. Wickens GE. Arid and semiarid ecosystems in encyclopedia of earth system science, 1. London: Academic Press Inc; 1992.
    CrossRef
  76. Wilson EO. The diversity of life. London: Penguin Books; 1992.
    CrossRef
  77. Zaghloul MS, Hamrick JL, Moustafa AA, Kamel WM, El-Ghareeb R. Genetic diversity within and among sinai populations of three Ballota species (Lamiaceae). J Hered. 2006;97(1):45-54. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/esj008.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  78. Zahram MA, Willis AJ. Plant life in the River Nile in Egypt. Cairo: Al Hadara Publishing; 2003.
    CrossRef
  79. Zahran M, Amer M, Aflah A, Ghaly O. Endemic species in Sinai Peninsula, Egypt, with particular reference to Saint Katherine Protectorate: I- Ecological features. J Environ Sci. 2015;44(4):589-609.
  80. Zahran MA, Willis AJ. The vegetation of Egypt. 2nd ed. Dordrecht: Springer; 2009.

Share this article on

Related articles in JEE

  • There is No Related Article.
Close ✕

Journal of Ecology and Environment

pISSN 2287-8327 eISSN 2288-1220