Journal of Ecology and Environment

pISSN 2287-8327 eISSN 2288-1220

Article

Home Article View

Research

Published online July 17, 2023
https://doi.org/10.5141/jee.23.019

Journal of Ecology and Environment (2023) 47:07

Plant diversity of the pads of electric towers along the deltaic Mediterranean coast of Egypt

Kamal Shaltout1 , Hani Beshara2 , Yassin Al-Sodany3* , Ahmed Sharaf El-Din1 and Ragab El-Fahar1

1Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Tanta University, Tanta 31527, Egypt
2Burullus Protected Area, NCS-EEAA, Cairo 81528, Egypt
3Department of Botany and Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafr El Sheikh Governorate 33511, Egypt

Correspondence to:Yassin Al-Sodany
E-mail yalsodany@yahoo.com

Received: March 27, 2023; Revised: June 17, 2023; Accepted: June 19, 2023

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ The publisher of this article is The Ecological Society of Korea in collaboration with The Korean Society of Limnology

Background: Comparing with the several types of infrastructures, linear infrastructures are known to facilitate the spread of undesirable species in ecosystems. Recently, some new man-made habitats (e.g., gravel pads of the high-voltage towers, solid wastes and sewage habitats) were established along the Deltaic Mediterranean coast of Egypt as a result of the construction of the E-W coastal international highway. The current study evaluates the floristic composition associated with the pads of high-voltage towers that had been constructed for stabilizing the power line towers in the North Nile Delta. Plant cover was measured for 22 randomly stand.
Results: Eighty-four species were recorded, of which 35 are perennials (41.6%), 2 biennials (2.3%) and 47 annuals (56.0%) belonging to 23 families. The largest families were Asteraceae (16 species), Poaceae (15 species), Chenopodiaceae (12 species), and Fabaceae (7 species). Ten aliens (10.7%) out of the 84 species were recorded. Therophytes have the highest percentage (58%), followed by hemicryptophytes (14%), chamaephytes (11%). Six vegetation groups were recognized in the study area after the application of two way indicator species analysis (TWINSPAN), Arthrocnemum macrostachyum, Phragmites australis, and Mesembryanthemum nodiflorum have the highest presence percentage. Both of Salsola cyclophylla and Solanum villosum were recorded for the first time in North Nile Delta. Natural habitat had the highest α-diversity, but the lowest β-diversity (4.9, 15.4), while gravel pads had the reverse (2.7, 30.8). Some species which are native to the desert habitats (e.g., Rumex pictus, Salsola kali, and Carthamus tenuis) were able to invade the North Nile Delta.
Conclusions: Habitat of gravel pads is an expressing form about the intense of disturbance in Deltaic Mediterranean coast of Egypt. More of efforts should be carried out to avoid more human disturbances that creating as ruderal habitats which open the gate to invasive species in the flora of North Nile Delta.

Keywords: disturbance, detrended correspondence analysis, gravel pads habitat, North Nile Delta, ruderal habitat, two way indicator species analysis

The Mediterranean region is characterized by its high plant richness (Myers et al. 2000), where about 10% of the world’s vascular plants exist (Radford et al. 2011). Coastal areas are typically rich in natural resources, which provide excellent opportunities for economic activities; particularly resource-based economic activities such as agriculture, fisheries, tourism, oil and gas extraction, and maritime transportation, which all tend to be concentrated in these areas. Furthermore, coastal locations serve as important gathering points for a high number of immigrants, with rising need for housing, energy, products, and services (Balmford et al. 2002; Costanza et al. 1998).

The coastal zones of Egypt suffer from a number of serious problems including: unplanned development, land subsidence, excessive erosion rates, water logging, salt water intrusion, soil salinization and as well as several anthropogenic activities especially unplanned construction of villages and ecosystem degradation (Eid and El-Marsafawy 2002; El-Raey 1997). Deltaic Mediterranean coast of Egypt is rich in many wild plant species, which seem to be economically promising. It differentiates into four habitats: sand formations, salt marshes, fertile sandy lands and reed swamps (Mashaly 1987; Shaltout et al. 1995). Deltaic areas are sensitive ecosystem toward both natural hazards and human interventions. During the last decades, Nile Delta coast has been subjecting to several threats, mainly anthropogenic, which leads to change the natural habitats and vegetation (El-Amier and Abd El-Gawad 2017). The coastal zone of the Nile Delta lodges highly populated cities (e.g., Alexandria, Baltim, Damietta, and Port Said) together with small towns and villages with major populations of fishermen and farmers. It represents the major industrial, agricultural, and economic resource of the country. The area has been subjected to intensive and extensive unplanned developmental projects to foster the economic status of the local communities that, however, negatively impacted both land use and land cover characteristics.

Nile Delta coast is experiencing a pronounced landform transformation that is mainly controlled by man-made activities which happened in response to either social or economic trends, as well as the present local market trends and the population habits or both. These changes will certainly dramatically impact the Nile Delta coast, not only by reshaping the spatial distribution of the current landforms, but also will lead to a great change in the ecosystem characteristics (e.g., sea water intrusion, shoreline erosion, modification, transformation and disappearance of some natural ecosystems: Ali and El-Magd 2016).

Ruderal habitats may vary depending on the substrates of existing roads, transported soils and compacted rocks with different sizes (Frenkel 1977). Human activities such as construction and maintenance of transmission power lines and their associated rights-of-way create suitable conditions for establishment and growth of ruderal plant species that can threaten biodiversity and other ecological services of the nearby natural ecosystems (Wagner et al. 2014). These activities may facilitate the invasion of ruderal vegetation in natural ecosystems through several ways. First, fragmentation of natural habitats and loss of native vegetation increase environmental heterogeneity that facilitates the invisibility and spread of ruderal species (Tewksbury et al. 2002). Second, seeds and propagules of several ruderal species may be transported in constructed soil of pads and foundations for overhead utility line towers and substations (Cameron et al. 1997). Third, the internal disturbance of native vegetation creates gaps with increased resources that enhance the establishment of less competitive ruderal species (Ehrenfeld 2008). Fourth, establishment and maintenance of transmission line rights-of-way and their connected service tracks closer to access roads may favor dispersal of seeds and propagules of roadsides ruderal plant species (Rubino et al. 2002; Tyser and Worley 1992). Fifth, changes in soil physical properties and enhancement of soil nutrients may contribute to the establishment of ruderal plant species which have the ability to grow and thrive in this enriched soil (Cameron et al. 1997).

Although, urbanization and their attendant effects are obvious features in the Mediterranean wetlands, these effects remain insufficiently studied particularly in those of arid and semi-arid environments of North African countries where there is a rapid rate of uncontrolled urban development (Redeker and Kantoush 2014). Much less is known about the impact of the construction of gravel pads, which is a conspicuous landscape disturbance feature for supporting power line towers, and forming a network of linear terrestrial patches in wetlands. Spatial configuration of benched and graveled pads may facilitate the invasion and spread of ruderal plants into the intersected wetlands. In addition, the installation of these terrestrial barriers in water may induce sediment deposition and nutrient enrichment which change plant community development and create appropriate microhabitats for establishment of non-native plants in wetlands (Dubé et al. 2011; El-Bana 2015; Heneidy et al. 2021).

In last decade, North Nile Delta has been subjected to several projects in different fields such as construction of new cities and black sand company. Burullus Power Plant was constructed close the international road parallel to the Mediterranean coast, followed by huge transmission power lines network. There is a little knowledge about ruderal plants that colonize the new habitats initiated by these power plants. This study was carried out on the pads of high-voltage towers as a recent newly type of ruderal habitats in the study area. It aims to evaluate their impacts on the vegetation in Mediterranean Deltaic coast in terms of floristic composition, life forms, chorotypes and plant communities. It also aims to assess the environmental factors that affect the prevailing plant communities.

Study area

The study area lies along the Deltaic Mediterranean coast of Egypt forming a belt extending in E-W direction for about 135 km between two the Nile branches (Rosetta and Damietta) and in N-S direction of about 8–15 km from the seashore (Fig. 1). This region is characterized by a morphological structure basically different from that to the west of Abu-Qir (Mareotis coast) and the east of Port-Said (Sinai coast). Sand dunes are the main geomorphic feature in the greatest part of the Deltaic coast, which has loose textured soils, thus they are considered as natural reservoirs of fresh water. Also, this coast is characterized by salt marshes and three Northern shallow brackish lakes: Manzalla in the east with an area of ca.1,000 km², Burullus in the middle (452 km²) and Idku in the west (36 km²), which are joined to the Mediterranean by narrow gaps in the sandy bars (Ramdani et al. 2001). Both the western and eastern section of Egyptian Mediterranean coast depend mainly on rainfall as the main source of water, while the Deltaic coast has five water sources (winter rainfall, River Nile water, sea water, northern lakes, and underground water).

Figure 1. Deltaic Mediterranean Coast of Egypt indicating the sampled pads of high-voltage towers (red).

Climatologically (Ayyad and Le Floc’h 1983; UNESCO 1977; Zahran et al. 1985), the Mediterranean coastal region of Egypt belongs to the dry arid climatic zone of Koppen’s classification system (as quoted by Trewartha and Horn 1980), the arid mesothermal province of Thornthwaite (1948) and Mediterranean arid bioclimatic zone of Emberger (1955). The region lies in Meigs’s warm coastal desert (Meigs 1973): summer’s warmest month with mean temperature of < 30°C, and winter’s coldest month with mean temperature of > 10°C. Though occasional rainstorms occur in winter, most of days are sunny and mild.

This coast is recognized into different habitats, some of them are natural such as inland sand sheets, sand dunes, coastal dunes, saline sand deposits, salt marshes, sand sheets and brackish shallow lakes; while others are man-made habitats such as water courses (canals and drains), roads, railways, abandoned and cultivated fields (Shaltout et al. 2010). Recently, some new man-made habitats were established in the northern part of Nile Delta due to the construction of the coastal international highway such as gravel pads of the high-voltage towers, solid wastes and sewage habitats.

Sampling process

Twenty-two stands on gravel pads of high-voltage towers under transmission power line (each stand represent a pad one and tours) were selected randomly as a type of ruderal habitat to represent the vegetation physiognomy along such new man-made habitat. The average distance between each stand and the other ranged from 0.5–5 km (Fig. 1). During this study, additional 24 sampled stands were selected in the natural habitat in the vicinity of the sampled pads to compare between the plant diversity of the recorded species in both habitats. The field work was carried out during January–December 2021. The area of each stand was (20 × 20 m) which represents the minimal area for the vegetation cover in this region. In each stand, the following data were recorded: 1- GPS Coordinates (Garmin 12XL), 2- list of the present species, and 3- visual estimates of the total cover and cover percentage of each species according to Braun- Blanquet scale (Mueller-Dombois and Ellenberg 1974). Nomenclature of the recorded species was according to Täckholm (1974), Boulos (1999–2005, 2009). Voucher specimens were deposited at the Herbaria of Faculty of Science, at Tanta and Kafr-Elsheikh Universities. Alien species were determined based on the recent updating of the alien species in the Egyptian flora (see El-Beheiry et al. 2020; Shaltout 2020).

Vegetation measurements

Species life form was identified following the scheme of (Raunkiær 1937). National distributions of the recorded species were determined according to (Täckholm 1974); while their global distributions (Table 1) (White and Léonard 1990) were determined from Zohary (1966, 1987), 1987, Feinbrun-Dothan (1978, 1986), 1986 and Boulos (1999–2005). Species richness (Alpha-diversity) of the vegetation groups (VGs) was calculated as the average number of species per stand, while species turnover (beta-diversity) was calculated as the ratio between the total species recorded in a certain vegetation group and its alpha-diversity. Shannon–Weaver index (H=pilogpi) for the relative species evenness, and Simpson index (C=pi2) for the relative concentration of dominance were estimated based on the relative cover (pi) of species (Pielou 1975; Whittaker and Levin 1977).

Table 1 . Global distribution (floristic categories) according to White and Léonard (1990).

Floristic categoryCodeDescription
Saharo-SindianSAFlat and arid areas of North Africa, the Arabian Peninsula, southern Iran and the deserts of Pakistan and west India. Saint Catherine in Sinai and Genu and Homag in southern Iran.
Sudano-ZambeziansSZSavanna and grassland vegetation with occasional dry forests and thickets, and patches of edaphically controlled swampy vegetation, in a wide zone in Subsaharan Africa around the Guineo-Congolian region.
Irano-TuranianITCentral Asia and West Asiatic areas and Mediterranean floristic region (western and eastern parts of the Mediterranean Basin).
Euro-SiberianESExtends from Iceland around most of Europe via Siberia to Kamchatka.
MediterraneanMEIncludes the Mediterranean Sea and seven Member States, either partially (France, Portugal, Italy, and Spain) or completely (Greece, Malta, and Cyprus).
PalaeotropicalPALThe tropical areas of Africa, Asia, and Oceania (excluding Australia and New Zealand).
PantropicalPANCovers tropical regions of both hemispheres.
CosmopolitanCOSMExtends across all or most of the world.
AustralianAUSTNew Guinea, Australia, New Zealand, and Oceania.

Data from the article of White and Léonard (Lubrecht & Cramer Ltd.; 1990. p. 229-46).



Soil analysis

Three soil samples were collected from profiles (0–50 cm) of each sampled stand and mixed as one composite sample. Soil texture (percentages of sand, silt, and clay) was determined by Bouyoucos hydrometer. Total organic matter (O.M.) was determined based on loss-on-ignition at 450°C (Wilke 2005), and total CaCO3 was estimated by the use of Collin’s calcimeter (Wright 1939). Soil-water extracts (1:5) were prepared for the estimation of electrical conductivity (EC in mS cm–1) using electric conductivity meter and soil reaction (pH) using pH-meter (Jenway 3020; Cole-Parmer, Staffordshire, UK) (Allen 1989). Bicarbonates (HCO3), sulphates (SO4) and chlorides (Cl) were analyzed according to Dewis and Freitas (1970) and Ayers and Westcot (1985). Soil extracts of 5 g soil samples were prepared using 2.5% v/v glacial acetic acid for estimating K, Ca, Na, and Mg. Na and K were analyzed using a flame photometer (Corning 410 BWB; Sherwood Scientific Ltd., Cambridge, UK).

Data analysis

Two way indicator species analysis (TWINSPAN) and detrended correspondence analysis (DCA; DECORANA) were applied to the matrix of 84 species in 22 stands (Hill 1979a, b). Presence percentage for each species in each vegetation group was calculated as the number of stands for each species divided into total number of stands. The DCA axes and environmental variables were correlated after the ordination procedure. The direct ordination was performed using canonical correspondence analysis (CANOCO) program for windows version (4.5); which is a constrained ordination technique, where results are simultaneously trained based on species abundance and environmental variables (Kent and Coker 1992). The variation in the soil characters in relation to VGs was assessed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) according to SPSS program v. 21 (IBM Co., Armonk, NY, USA).

Floristic composition

The recorded species in the study area, their geographical distributions, life forms, habits, biogeographical regions, VGs and their relative constancy values (P%) are listed in Table S1 and Fig. S1. Eighty-four species: 35 perennials (41.6%), 2 biennials (2.4%) and 47 annuals (56.0%) belonging to 23 families were recorded. The largest families were Asteraceae (16 species = 19%), Poaceae (15 species = 17.8%), Chenopodiaceae (12 species = 14.2%), and Fabaceae (7 species = 8.3%). These four families represent about 59.3% of the total recorded species forming most of the floristic structure in the study area.

Ten alien species (10.7%) were recorded among the total species (Fig. 2). Regarding the life forms, therophytes have the highest percentage (58%), followed by hemicryptophytes (14%), chamaephytes (11%), geophyte-helophytes (11%), and phanerophytes (5%) (Fig. 3). Thirty-three native-weeds and 10 aliens were associated with 41 natural species. The alien species are: Acacia saligna, Atriplex semibaccata, Cynanchum acutum, Foeniculum vulgare, Heliotropium curassavicum, Nicotiana glauca, Symphyottrichum squamatum, Apium graveolens, Bassia indica, and Eleusine indica. Nine species are restricted to the gravel pads and not recorded in the natural habitats (Acacia saligna, Salsola cyclophylla, Astragalus tribuloides, Chenopodium ambrosioides, Herniaria hemistemon, Lotus peregrinus, Solanum villosum, Spergularia diandra, and Sphenopus divaricatus).

Figure 2. Plant families of ≥ 2 recorded species.
Figure 3. Raunkier life-form spectrum of the recorded species.

National and global distribution

Regarding the national phytogeographical distribution (Fig. 4), 89.3% of the recorded species belong to the Mediterranean (75 species), followed by the Nile (63 species = 75%) and desert (62 species = 73.8%) regions. The global bio-geographical distribution indicated that the bi-regional (34 species = 40.5%) were the highest, followed by the pluri-regional (21 species = 25%) and mono-regional elements (20 species = 23.8%) elements. Eight cosmopolitan species (9.5%) were recoded, while there was no endemic species. In general, Mediterranean elements had the highest contribution (57 species), followed by Saharo-Arabian (34 species and Irano-Turanian (30 species). On the other hand, Paleotropic and Sudano-Zambezian elements had the lowest contribution (3 and 6 species, respectively).

Figure 4. National distributions of the recorded species in the present study. S: South Sinai; M: Mediterranean coast; N: Nile region; O: oases; D: desert; R: Red Sea coast; G: Gebel Elba. Values above the bars are the numbers of species in each region.

Multivariate analysis

Application of the TWINSPAN classification technique on the cover estimates of the 84 species recorded in 22 stands of gravel pads led to the recognition of 9 VGs (communities) at the 6th level of classification, but 6 groups at the 4th level. These six groups are named after the species of highest presence percentage as follows: I- Reicharadia tingitana, II- Arthrocnemum macrostachyum, III- Zygophyllum album, IV- Cynodon dactylon, V- Carthamus tenuis, and VI- Alhagi graecorum groups (Table 2, Fig. 5A). Consequently, application of the DCA ordination technique on the same set of data indicates a reasonable segregation among these groups along ordination axes 1 and 2 (Fig. 5B). On the other hand, Cynodon dactylon (VG IV) had the highest α-diversity (0.45) followed by Zygophyllum album (VG III) (0.37), while Alhagi graecorum (VG VI) had the highest β-diversity followed by Cynodon dactylon (VG IV) and Zygophyllum album (VG III) (Table 3). Nine species associated only with the gravel pads: Acacia saligna, Salsola cyclophylla, Astragalus tribuloides, Chenopodium ambrosioides, Herniaria hemistemon, Lotus peregrinus, Solanum villosum, Spergularia diandra, and Sphenopus divaricatus. Natural habitat had the highest α-diversity (4.9), while the gravel pads had the highest β-diversity (30.8), Shannon–Weaver index (1.9) and H-max (1.9). Both of them had the same value of Simpson index (0.01) (Table 4).

Table 2 . Characteristics of 6 vegetation groups (I–VI) identified after the application of two way indicator species analysis (TWINSPAN) on 22 stands including recorded species.

VGNo. of stands% of standsFirst dominant speciesP%Second dominant speciesP%
I15Reicharadia tingitana (L.) Roth100Polygonum equisetiforme Sm.100
II418Arthrocnemum macrostachyum (Moric.)100Phragmites australis (Cuv.) Trin. ex Steud.50
III627Zygophyllum album L.83Arthrocnemum macrostachyum (Moric.) K.83
IV523Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.80Carthamus tenuis (Boiss & Blanche) Bornm.80
V418Carthamus tenuis (Boiss & Blanche) Bor.75Conyza bonariensis (L.) Cronquist75
VI29Alhagi graecorum Boiss.100Parapholis incurva (L.) C.E. Hubb.100

VG: vegetation group.


Table 3 . Characteristics of the 6 vegetation groups derived after the application of two way indicator species analysis (TWINSPAN) classification technique.

SpeciesVegetation groupTotal
IIIIIIIVVVIActual%
Diversity
Total species4153239301884-
α-diversity0.050.20.370.450.360.21-
β-diversity807583.88438.385.7-
Natural species11015191654148.8
Native weeds35121412123339.3
Alien species156311011.9
Life forms
Phanerophytes321144.8
Hemicryptophytes455641314.3
Chamaephytes2551910.7
Geophyte-helophytes1234489.5
Parasites111.2
Therophytes36172518104958.3
Floristic category
Mono-regional379942023.8
Bi-regional4615161153440.5
Pluri-regional2710762125.0
Cosmopolitan1343389.5
Saharo-Sindian1711181133440.5
Mediterranean49182820125767.9
Irano-Turanian349141083035.7
Euro-Siberian337341517.9
Sudano-Zambezian553267.1
Palaeotropical11233.6
Pantropical233288.3

Values are presented as number only.

–: not available.


Table 4 . Diversity indices of gravel pads and natural habitat.

Diversity indexGravel padsNatural habitat
Total species8475
α-diversity2.704.90
Standard deviation2.603.60
β-diversity30.815.40
Shannon–Weaver index1.901.88
Simpson index0.010.01
H-max1.901.40

Values are presented as number only.


Figure 5. (A) Dendrogram of the 6 vegetation groups (VGs) derived after application of two way indicator species analysis (TWINSPAN) classification technique. (B) Cluster segregation of the 6 VGs along axes 1 and 2 using detrended correspondence analysis (DCA; DECORANA). The 6 groups are named after the characteristic species as follows; I: Reicharadia tingitana, II: Arthrocnemum macrostachyum, III: Zygophyllum album, IV: Cynodon dactylon, V: Carthamus tenuis, and VI: Alhagi graecorum.

Soil analysis

Soil analysis indicated that the silt, sand, saturation percentage (SP), EC, sulphate, and sodium contents varied significantly in relation to the 6 VGs (p < 0.05). Soils of group II (Arthrocnemum macrostachyum) had the highest content of silt, clay, SP, O.M., pH, EC, SO4-2, and Na+; but the lowest of sand (Table 5). Soils of group III (Zygophyllum album) had the highest of sand, HCO3-, Cl, Ca+², and Mg+²; but the lowest of silt, clay, and SP. Group IV (Cynodon dactylon) had the lowest of EC, while group VI (Alhagi graecorum) had the highest of O.M. and Ca+. Soils of group V (Carthamus tenuis) had the highest of K+, but the lowest of bicarbonates and chlorides; while those of group I (Reicharadia tingitana) had the lowest of EC, sulphates, Mg+2, and Na+. CANOCO ordination plot indicates that the O.M., EC, sulphates and sodium are the factors that mainly affect the distribution of the recorded species in the habitat of gravel pads (Fig. 6).

Table 5 . Mean ± standard deviation of the soil characteristics of the 6 vegetation groups generated after the application of two way indicator species analysis (TWINSPAN) on the floristic composition of the 22 sampled stands of the recorded species.

Soil variableVegetation groupTotalF-value
IIIIIIIVVVI
Physical properties
Sand94.7 ± 4.082.0a ± 14.997.5a ± 1.095.2 ± 2.396.5 ± 1.095.5 ± 0.794.3 ± 6.93.6*
Silt3.3 ± 2.36.7a ± 3.51.5a ± 0.93.2 ± 1.82.1 ± 0.62.0 ± 0.02.9 ± 2.33.8*
Clay (%)2.5 ± 2.111.3a ± 11.81.0a ± 0.31.8 ± 0.81.4 ± 0.52.5 ± 0.72.9 ± 5.12.8
SP20.3 ± 2.334.7a ± 17.718.5a ± 1.419.8 ± 1.919.3 ± 1.921.0 ± 1.421.5 ± 7.63.1*
O.M.2.2 ± 2.34.7a ± 4.13.9 ± 2.42.5 ± 1.60.9 ± 0.40.9a ± 0.82.7 ± 2.41.7
pH7.4 ± 0.17.9a ± 0.67.6 ± 0.17.4a ± 0.37.7 ± 0.57.6 ± 0.17.6 ± 0.31.3
EC (mS m-1)0.3a ± 0.25.3a ± 4.13.6 ± 2.11.8 ± 1.70.7 ± 0.10.7 ± 0.02.2 ± 2.53.3*
Chemical properties
HCO3–0.5 ± 0.30.5 ± 0.10.8a ± 0.40.5 ± 0.30.5a ± 0.20.6 ± 0.10.6 ± 0.31.3
Cl–0.8 ± 0.54.9 ± 6.810.0a ± 7.53.5 ± 4.40.6a ± 0.51.0 ± 0.64.3 ± 5.92.4
SO4–2 (meq 100 gm-1)0.3a ± 0.221.9a ± 21.17.7 ± 3.75.3 ± 4.12.3 ± 0.62.1 ± 0.66.6 ± 9.53.1*
Ca+21.4 ± 1.11.7 ± 1.85.0a ± 2.72.9 ± 3.40.9 ± 0.50.7a ± 0.22.5 ± 2.62.2
Mg+20.1 ± 0.10.7 ± 0.11.0a ± 0.80.4 ± 0.30.7 ± 0.40.5 ± 0.00.6 ± 0.51.7
Na+0.1 ± 0.024.7a ± 20.912.3 ± 9.15.9 ± 5.11.8 ± 0.52.2 ± 0.28.2 ± 11.23.4*
K+0.1 ± 0.00.1 ± 0.10.2 ± 0.00.1 ± 0.10.3 ± 0.40.2 ± 0.00.2 ± 0.21.0

SP: saturation percentage; O.M.: organic matter; EC: electrical conductivity.

aMaximum and minimum values.

F value were significant at *p ≤ 0.05.


Figure 6. Canonical correspondence analysis (CANOCO) ordination plot for the edaphic variables and the 22 sampled stands (1–22). O.M.: organic matter; SP: saturation percentage; K: potassium; Mg: magnesium; Ca: calcium; EC: electrical conductivity; Na: sodium; HCO3: bicarbonate; SO4: sulphates.

The floristic change is often caused by changes induced by human’s beings. Ecological factors causing the decline of species in urban biotopes include: reduction in the variety of habitats, soil movements and construction, lowering of the ground water table and other alternations to the water balance, changes in use (e.g., from kitchen to ornamental garden), abandoning periodic working of soil, soil compaction, intensive care with frequent mowing and weeding (Al-Sodany 2009; Korneck and Sukopp 1988; Scholz 1960).

This study indicated that the majority of plant species within the pad plots belong to Asteraceae, Poaceae, and Fabaceae. These families represent the main bulk of the ruderal plant species in Egypt (Abd El-Ghani et al. 2011) and in the disturbed road networks of Mediterranean climate regions (Di Castri et al. 1990). These families were the most represented in the weed flora of the agro-ecosystems of Nile valley (Abd El-Ghani et al. 2013), Nile Delta (Shaltout et al. 2010) including North Nile Delta (Al-Sodany 2006, 2009). Also, this result agrees with the evidence that both Poaceae and Asteraceae has the highest contribution to the recorded species. The tendency of families to beget alien invasive species can be explained by their biological features. Asteraceae is one of the most evolutionary advanced plant families (Cronquist 1981), where its members possess many features that are advantageous for invasion (e.g., high reproductive rate, large proportion of self-pollinated species, self-dispersal and vegetative spread, specialized dispersal structures such as pappus and hooked seeds, and high level of apomixis which account for their superior ability to invade adventive areas: Pyšek 1997, 1998). Similarly, successful dispersal mechanisms in Poaceae may explain why it is one of the most commonly invaded families (Cronquist 1981). Many of the species of both families are synanthropic species occurring in the adjacent cultivated lands as weeds, where they spread along roads and disturbed grounds, and colonized new man-made habitats, and assume a weedy character (Lausi and Nimis 1985).

Deltaic Mediterranean coast of Egypt can be divided ecologically into four man habitats: salt marsh, sand formation, reed swamp and fertile lands (Zahran et al. 1990). The present study distinguished the gravel pads as novelty habitat in the study area, this may be attributed to the fact that the construction and use of tracks, roads, canals, railway and airports as a human activities have involved many changes, some of them are direct effect including the destruction of the existing habitats and the provision of new ones which have special characteristics (Lousley 1970).

It is worth noting that, a mixture of different floristic elements such as Cosmopoliton, Palaeotropical, Pantropical, Saharo-Arabian, Sudano-Zambezian, and Irano-Turanuian elements are represented by variable number of species in the study area. This may be attributed to human impact, history of agriculture and capability of certain floristic elements to penetrate the study area from several adjacent phytogeographical regions (Zahran and Willis 2009).

Many of the species identified in the present study (84 species) are compared to those of the previous related studies. It was found that 57% by the recorded species in the present study were recorded in the study of ruderal plant communities in Nile Delta (El-Sheikh 1996), 47% were recorded also in the study of gravel pads in the Mediterranean wetlands of Egypt (El-Bana 2015). Some species are native to the desert of Egypt and invaded the Nile Delta region. Such invasion may be associated with the transport of sand, gravel and ballast from the desert for the construction of roads and houses in the Nile Delta region. Of these species are Rumex pictus, Salsola kali, and Carthamus tenuis. This conclusion is supported by Shaltout et al. (1995) in his study on the post-agricultural succession in the Nile Delta, who recorded Ifloga spicata as a new record to this region, and related its presence to the transportation of building materials from the desert.

Therophytes (i.e., annuals) are more represented species, this could be explained in the view that the annual species are the most successful colonizers of most highly disturbed areas (e.g., disturbance by trampling of roads and fields by man, animals and vehicles, firing, grazing and disturbance by maintenance processes as laying of electronic telephone cables). This could be attributed to the fact that annuals have higher reproductive capacity, and ecological, morphological and genetic plasticity (Grime 1979; Harper 1977; Kowarik 1985).

Disturbance is an important gateway for invasive species which are usually introduced first into ruderal habitats, from where they spread to other habitats (Catford et al. 2012). The present study recorded 10 alien species (e.g., Acacia saligna, Atriplex semibaccata, and Heliotropium curassavicum), which represent about 4% of alien species in the Egyptian flora (Shaltout 2020). This may be attributed to the fact that several ruderal habitats situated in cities are drier than their surrounding habitats, making them more suitable for alien species, many of which originate from warm and dry regions. The growth of some alien species can also be encouraged by building activity (Kowarik 1990), which typically takes place near many ruderal habitats (e.g., constructions sites) that experience strong disturbances, resulting in the creation of empty niches that promote the expansion of alien species (Mack et al. 2000).

Ruderal habitat may facilitate the entry of plants into a new area (Frenkel 1977). This can contribute in the explanation of nine species that not recorded in the natural habitat and recorded in gravel pads habitat (Acacia saligna, Salsola cyclophylla, Astragalus tribuloides, Chenopodium ambrosioides, Herniaria hemistemon, Lotus peregrinus, Solanum villosum, Spergularia diandra, and Sphenopus divaricatus); two of them (Salsola cyclophylla and Solanum villosum) are the first records in North Nile Delta (Al-Sodany 1992, 2006, 2009; Mashaly et al. 2008; Shaltout and Al-Sodany 2008; Shaltout et al. 2010).

Diversity indices are related with both undisturbed and disturbed habitats. The present study indicated that the natural habitats had the highest α-diversity but the lowest β-diversity (4.9, 15.4), while the habitat of gravel pads had the lowest α-diversity but the highest β-diversity (2.7, 30.8). This can be contributed that the species richness and unique species were lowest in the highly disturbed habitat where human disturbances can result in fragmentation of natural habitats, which leads to the dropping of species richness (McKinney 2002). On the other hand, Warwick and Clarke (1993) reported that the β-diversity increased in disturbed sites compared with the natural sites deduced that increased β- diversity might be used as a diagnostic tool in disturbed areas.

CANOCO ordination plot indicates that the O.M., EC, sulphates, and sodium are the main factors that affect the distribution of the recorded species in the habitat of gravel pads. This could be interpreted in the view that this habitat is covered with layer of high resistant-electric materials such as gravels, stones, sand, and crushed rocks to prevent the formation of puddles and accumulation of water, making it suitable dry habitat for some species such as: Echinops spinosus, Salsola cyclophylla, Atractylis carduus, and Bassia muricata (Al-Sodany 2009; Boulos 1999–2005).

Habitat of gravel pads reflects the intense of disturbance in Deltaic Mediterranean coast. Urgent efforts should be carried out to avoid more human disturbances that creating ruderal habitats which act as open gates to invasive species in the flora of North Nile Delta (e.g., Acacia saligna and Bassia indica). Human-made habitats such as gravel pads of power line towers can be utilized for sustainable land use, employing introduced native woody trees on the connected service tracks in combination with herbaceous species on the pads under the overhead towers. This would optimize ecological benefits and values of the constructed patches. The trees can be used for firewood production. Herbaceous productivity on gravel pads can be utilized by livestock grazing.

Supplementary information accompanies this paper at https://doi.org/10.5141/jee.23.019.

Table S1 Floristic composition and presence percentage (P%) of the recorded species in both gravel pads and natural habitats in the study area. Fig. S1 Photos of the pads of electric towers along the deltaic Mediterranean coast of Egypt.

TWINSPAN: Two way indicator species analysis

VG: Vegetation group

EC: Electrical conductivity

DCA: Detrended correspondence analysis

CANOCO: Canonical correspondence analysis

SP: Saturation percentage

O.M.: Organic matter

YAS, HB analyzed and interpreted data regarding transplant experiment. YAS, HB, KS performed statistical analysis. YAS was a major contributor in writing the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

  1. Abd El-Ghani M, Bornkamm R, El-Sawaf N, Turky H. Plant species distribution and spatial habitat heterogeneity in the landscape of urbanizing desert ecosystem of Egypt. Urban Ecosyst. 2011;14(4):585-616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-011-0188-1.
    CrossRef
  2. Abd El-Ghani M, Soliman A, Hamdy R, Bennoba E. Weed flora in the reclaimed lands along the northern sector of the Nile Valley in Egypt. Turk J Bot. 2013;37(3):464-88. https://doi.org/10.3906/bot-1205-11.
    CrossRef
  3. Ali EM, El-Magd IA. Impact of human interventions and coastal processes along the Nile Delta coast, Egypt during the past twenty-five years. Egypt J Aquat Res. 2016;42(1):1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejar.2016.01.002.
    CrossRef
  4. Allen SE. Chemical analysis of ecological materials. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications; 1989.
    CrossRef
  5. Al-Sodany YM. Vegetation analysis of the Northern part of Nile Delta region. [Master's thesis]. Tanta: Tanta University; 1992.
  6. Al-Sodany YM. Recently changes in the vegetation of Burullus Wetlands. Paper presented at: The 4th International Conference on Biological Sciences, Botany; 2006.
    CrossRef
  7. Ayers RS, Westcot DW. Water quality for agriculture: FAO irrigation and drainage paper 29. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization; 1985.
  8. Ayyad MG, Le Floc'h E. An ecological assessment of renewable resources for rural agricultural development in the Western Mediterranean Coastal region of Egypt. Case study: El Omayed test-area. Montpellier: Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique; 1983.
  9. Balmford A, Bruner A, Cooper P, Costanza R, Farber S, Green RE, et al. Economic reasons for conserving wild nature. Science. 2002;297(5583):950-3. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1073947.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  10. Boulos L. Flora of Egypt. Cairo: Al Hadara; 1999.
    CrossRef
  11. Boulos L. Flora of Egypt: checklist. Cairo: Al Hadara; 2009.
    CrossRef
  12. Cameron DS, Leopold DJ, Raynal DJ. Effect of landscape position on plant diversity and richness on electric transmission rights-of-way in New York State. Can J Bot. 1997;75(2):242-51. https://doi.org/10.1139/b97-026.
    CrossRef
  13. Catford JA, Daehler CC, Murphy HT, Sheppard AW, Hardesty BD, Westcott DA, et al. The intermediate disturbance hypothesis and plant invasions: implications for species richness and management. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst. 2012;14(3):231-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppees.2011.12.002.
    CrossRef
  14. Costanza R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, et al; d'Arge R. The value of ecosystem services: putting the issues in perspective. Ecol Econ. 1998;25(1):67-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(98)00019-6.
    CrossRef
  15. Cronquist A. An integrated system of classification of flowering plants. New York (NY): Columbia University Press; 1981.
    CrossRef
  16. Dewis J, Freitas F. Physical and chemical methods of soil and water analysis. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization; 1970.
    CrossRef
  17. Di Castri F, Hansen AJ, Debussche M. Biological invasions in Europe and the Mediterranean basin. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1990.
    CrossRef
  18. Dubé C, Pellerin S, Poulin M. Do power line rights-of-way facilitate the spread of non-peatland and invasive plants in bogs and fens? Botany. 2011;89(2):91-103. https://doi.org/10.1139/B10-089.
    CrossRef
  19. Ehrenfeld JG. Exotic invasive species in urban wetlands: environmental correlates and implications for wetland management. J Appl Ecol. 2008;45(4):1160-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01476.x.
    CrossRef
  20. Eid HM, El-Marsafawy SM. Adaptation to climate change in Egyptian agriculture and water resources. Paper presented at: 3rd International Symposium on Sustainable Agro-environmental Systems: New Technologies and Applications (AGRON 2002); 2002 Oct 26-29; Cairo,. Egypt; 2002. p. 26-9.
  21. El-Amier YA, Abd El-Gawad AM. Plant communities along the international coastal highway of Nile delta, Egypt. J Sci Agric. 2017;1:117-31. https://doi.org/10.25081/jsa.2017.v1.47.
    CrossRef
  22. El-Bana MI. Gravel pads of powerline towers as human-made habitats for ruderal vegetation in some Mediterranean wetlands of Egypt: implications for management. Egypt J Aquat Res. 2015;41(1):83-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejar.2015.03.004.
    CrossRef
  23. El-Beheiry MH, Hosni HA, El-Din AS, Shaltout SK, Ahmed DA. Updating the checklist of the alien flora in Egypt. Taeckholmia. 2020;40(1):41-56. https://doi.org/10.21608/taec.2020.21300.1011.
    CrossRef
  24. El-Raey M. Vulnerability assessment of the coastal zone of the Nile delta of Egypt, to the impacts of sea level rise. Ocean Coast Manag. 1997;37(1):29-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0964-5691(97)00056-2.
    CrossRef
  25. El-Sheikh M. Ruderal plants communities of the Nile delta region [PhD dissertation]. Tanta: Tanta University; 1996.
    CrossRef
  26. Emberger L. Une classification biogéographique des climats. Recueil des Travaux des Laboratoires de Botanique, Géologie et Zoologie de la Faculté des Sciences de l'Université de Montpellier, Série Botanique Fascicule 7. Montpellier: Université de Montpellier; 1955.
    CrossRef
  27. Feinbrun-Dothan N. Flora Palastina. Part 3. Text Ericaceae to Compositae. Jerusalem: Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities; 1978.
  28. Feinbrun-Dothan N. Flora Palastina. Part 4. Text Alismataceae to Orchidaceae. Jerusalem: Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities; 1986.
  29. Frenkel RE. Ruderal vegetation along some California roadsides. Berkeley (CA): University of California Press; 1977.
  30. Grime JP. Plant strategies and vegetation processes. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons; 1979.
  31. Harper JL. Population biology of plants. London: Academic Press; 1977.
  32. Heneidy SZ, Halmy MWA, Toto SM, Hamouda SK, Fakhry AM, Bidak LM, et al. Pattern of urban flora in intra-city railway habitats (Alexandria, Egypt): a conservation perspective. Biology (Basel). 2021;10(8):698. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10080698.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  33. Kent M, Coker P. Vegetation description and analysis: a practical approach. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons; 1992.
  34. Korneck D, Sukopp H. [Rote Liste der in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland ausgestorbenen,verschollenen und gefährdeten Farn- und Blütenpflanzen und ihre Auswertung für den Arten- und Biotopschutz]. Bad Godesberg: Bundesforschungsanstalt für Naturschutz u. Landschaftsökologie; 1988. German.
  35. Kowarik I. Grundlagen der Stadukologie und Forderungen Anchihrer Berucksichtigug bri der Stadgestaltung am Beispiel Berlins, Schriftenrh. DBV. Jungend. 1985;3:22-39. German.
  36. Kowarik I. Some responses of flora and vegetation to urbanization in Central Europe. In: Sukopp H, Hejný S, Kowarik I, editors. Urban ecology: plants and plant communities in urban environments. Hague: SPB Academic Publishing; 1990. p. 45-74.
  37. Lausi D, Nimis PL. Roadside vegetation in boreal South Yukon and adjacent Alaska. Phytocoenologia. 1985;13(1):103-38. https://doi.org/10.1127/phyto/13/1985/103.
    CrossRef
  38. Lousley JE. The influence of transport on a changing flora. In: Perring F, editor. The flora of a changing Britain. Hampton: E.W. Classey; 1970. p. 73-83.
  39. Mack RN, Simberloff D, Lonsdale WM, Evans H, Clout M, Bazzaz FA. Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecol Appl. 2000;10(3):689-710. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[0689:BICEGC]2.0.CO;2.
    CrossRef
  40. Mashaly I. Ecological and floristic studies of Dakahlia-Damietta region [PhD dissertation]. Mansoura: Mansoura University; 1987.
    CrossRef
  41. Mashaly IA, El-Habashy IE, El-Halawany EF, Omar G. Habitats and plant communities in the Nile Delta of Egypt I. Deltaic Mediterranean coastal habitat. Pak J Biol Sci. 2008;11(22):2532-44. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2008.2532.2544.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  42. McKinney ML. Urbanization, biodiversity, and conservation: the impacts of urbanization on native species are poorly studied, but educating a highly urbanized human population about these impacts can greatly improve species conservation in all ecosystems. BioScience. 2002;52(10):883-90. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0883:UBAC]2.0.CO;2.
    CrossRef
  43. Meigs P. World distribution of coastal deserts. In: Amiran DHK, Wilson AW, editors. Coastal deserts: their natural and human environments. Tucson (AZ): University of Arizona Press; 1973. p. 3-13.
  44. Mueller-Dombois D, Ellenberg H. Aims and methods of vegetation ecology. New York (NY): Wiley; 1974.
  45. Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, da Fonseca GA, Kent J. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature. 2000;403(6772):853-8. https://doi.org/10.1038/35002501.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  46. Pielou EC. Ecological diversity. New York (NY): John Wiley & Sons; 1975.
    CrossRef
  47. Pyšek P. Compositae as invaders: better than the others? Preslia. 1997;69:9-22.
  48. Pyšek P. Is there a taxonomic pattern to plant invasions? Oikos. 1998;82(2):282-94. https://doi.org/10.2307/3546968.
    CrossRef
  49. Radford EA, Catullo G, de Montmollin B. Important plant areas of the South and East Mediterranean region: priority sites for conservation. Gland: International Union for Conservation of Nature; 2011.
    CrossRef
  50. Ramdani M, Flower RJ, Elkhiati N, Kraïem MM, Fathi AA, Birks HH, et al. North African wetland lakes: characterization of nine sites included in the CASSARINA project. Aquat Ecol. 2001;35(3-4):281-302. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011957324901.
    CrossRef
  51. Raunkiær C. Plant life forms. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1937.
  52. Redeker C, Kantoush SA. The Nile Delta: urbanizing on diminishing resources. Built Environ. 2014;40(2):201-12.
    CrossRef
  53. Rubino DL, Williams CE, Moriarity WJ. Herbaceous layer contrast and alien plant occurrence in utility corridors and riparian forests of the Allegheny High Plateau. J Torrey Bot Soc. 2002;129(2):125-35. https://doi.org/10.2307/3088726.
    CrossRef
  54. Shaltout KH, El-Kady HF, Al-Sodany YM. Vegetation analysis of the Mediterranean region of Nile Delta. Vegetatio. 1995;116(1):73-83. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00045280.
    CrossRef
  55. Shaltout KH, Al-Sodany YM. Vegetation analysis of Burullus wetland: a RAMSAR site in Egypt. Wetl Ecol Manag. 2008;16(5):421-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-008-9079-5.
    CrossRef
  56. Shaltout KH, El-Din AS, Ahmed DAEA. Plant life in the Nile Delta. Tanta: Tanta University Press; 2010.
    CrossRef
  57. Shaltout SK. Assessment and documentation of the alien species in the Egyptian flora [PhD dissertation]. Tanta: Tanta University Press; 2020.
    CrossRef
  58. Täckholm V. Students' flora of Egypt. 2nd ed. Cairo: Cairo University; 1974.
    CrossRef
  59. Tewksbury JJ, Levey DJ, Haddad NM, Sargent S, Orrock JL, Weldon A, et al. Corridors affect plants, animals, and their interactions in fragmented landscapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99(20):12923-6. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.202242699.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  60. Thornthwaite CW. An approach toward a rational classification of climate. Geogr Rev. 1948;38(1):55-94. https://doi.org/10.2307/210739.
    CrossRef
  61. Trewartha GT, Horn LH. An introduction to climate. 5th ed. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill; 1980.
    CrossRef
  62. Tyser RW, Worley CA. Alien flora in grasslands adjacent to road and trail corridors in Glacier National Park, Montana (U.S.A.). Conserv Biol. 1992;6(2):253-62.
    CrossRef
  63. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). [Map of the world distribution of arid regions; explanatory note]. Paris: UNESCO; 1977. French.
    CrossRef
  64. Wagner DL, Metzler KJ, Leicht-Young SA, Motzkin G. Vegetation composition along a New England transmission line corridor and its implications for other trophic levels. For Ecol Manag. 2014;327:231-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.04.026.
    CrossRef
  65. Warwick RM, Clarke KR. Increased variability as a symptom of stress in marine communities. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 1993;172(1-2):215-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0981(93)90098-9.
    CrossRef
  66. White F, Léonard J. Phytogeographical links between Africa and Southwest Asia. In: Engel HT, Frey W, Kürschner H, editors. Contributiones Selectae ad Floram et Vegetationem Orientis. Berlin: Lubrecht & Cramer Ltd.; 1990. p. 229-46.
  67. Whittaker RH, Levin SA. The role of mosaic phenomena in natural communities. Theor Popul Biol. 1977;12(2):117-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-5809(77)90039-9.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  68. Wilke BM. Determination of chemical and physical soil properties. In: Margesin R, Schinner F, editors. Manual for soil analysis - monitoring and assessing soil bioremediation. Berlin: Springer; 2005. p. 47-95.
    CrossRef
  69. Wright CH. Soil analysis: a handbook of physical and chemical methods. 2nd ed. London: Thomas Murby & Co.; 1939.
    CrossRef
  70. Zahran MA, El Demerdash MA, Mashaly IA. On the ecology of the deltaic coast of the Mediterranean Sea, Egypt. I. General survey. Egypt Conf Bot Soc. 1985;4:1392-407.
  71. Zahran MA, El-Demerdash MA, Mashaly IA. Vegetation types of the Deltaic Mediterranean coast of Egypt and their environment. J Veg Sci. 1990;1(3):305-10. https://doi.org/10.2307/3235705.
    CrossRef
  72. Zahran MA, Willis AJ. The vegetation of Egypt. 2nd ed. Dordrecht: Springer; 2009.
    CrossRef
  73. Zohary M. Flora Palaestina. Part 1. Plates Equisetaceae to Moringaceae. Jerusalem: Israel Academy of Sciences & Humanities; 1966.
    CrossRef
  74. Zohary M. Flora Palaestina. Part 2, text Platanaceae to Umbelliferae. Jerusalem: Israel Academy of Sciences & Humanities; 1987.
    CrossRef

Share this article on

Related articles in JEE

  • There is No Related Article.
Close ✕

Journal of Ecology and Environment

pISSN 2287-8327 eISSN 2288-1220