Table. 3.

Summary of multiple regression analysis, showing the effect of forest type, location, mesh size, and presence of Chromolaena odorata on the linearized k-rate for the two different forest types

Treatments DDF MDF
t p-value t p-value
Forest edge –1.219 0.231 –0.180 0.858
Mesh size (5-mm) 7.073 < 0.01 7.447 < 0.01
Mixtures with C. odorata 0.656 0.516 2.104 0.043
Mesh size (5-mm) × forest edge –0.109 0.913 –1.591 0.121
Mixtures with C. odorata × forest plot 0.425 0.673 2.001 0.050
Mesh size (5-mm) × mixtures with C. odorata 0.019 0.984 0.231 0.818
Mesh size (5-mm) × mixtures with C. odorata × forest edge –0.119 0.905 –0.190 0.850

DDF: dipterocarp deciduous forest; MDF: mixed deciduous forest.

J Ecol Environ 2024;48:- https://doi.org/10.5141/jee.24.076
© J Ecol Environ