Table. 2.

Comparison of turnover rates, genus and species richness (per 1,000 m2) using the modified Whittaker plots across vegetation types

Nation Vegetation type or site Regression model (R2) Richness level Reference
Species Geneus
Republic of Korea Seonheul Gotzawal (n = 4) S = 9.6 + 4.37 log A (97.3%) 18 (11–32)a 17 (11–27)a This study
Jeoje Gotzawal (n = 4) S = 2 + 3.85 log A (91.9%) 28 (26–30)a 25 (23–26)a This study
Larix leptolepis plantation (n = 3) S = 8.6 + 10.23 log A (99.7%) 46 (32–66) 34 (5–54) You et al. (2023)
Quercus mongolica community (n = 3) S = 5.8 + 9.4 log A (96.2%) 45 (37–58) 28 (5–47) You et al. (2023)
Iran Grassland (n = 3) S = 36.2 + 8.5 log A (91.1%) 68 - Ghorbani et al. (2011)
Shrubland (n = 3) S = 20.8 + 4.5 log A (79.9%) 38 - Ghorbani et al. (2011)
USA Prairie (n = 18) S = 4.5 + 25.5 log A (99.2%) 40 (37–43) - Stohlgren et al. (1995)
Forest (n = 7) - 40 (37–43) - Stohlgren et al. (1995)
Ecotone (n = 7) - 41 (38–44) - Stohlgren et al. (1995)
China Deciduous forest (n = 3) - 114 (26–167) 93 (71–127) Xu et al. (2021)
Conifers and broad-leaved trees mixed forest (n = 3) - 123 (98–140) 93 (75–105) Xu et al. (2021)

Values are presented as mean (range).

-: not provided.

aData obtained directly from field surveys in this study.

J Ecol Environ 2024;48:- https://doi.org/10.5141/jee.24.051
© J Ecol Environ