Journal of Ecology and Environment

Table. 2. Table 2

Mean number of fruit per plant, weight per fruit, and size factors of fruit by treatments in two mango plantations located in Phrao and Mae Taeng, Chiang Mai Province, northern Thailand during 2019 season

Site	Treatment	No. fruit/tree	Weight/fruit (g)	Size of fruit (cm)
Site	Treatment	No. fruit/tree	Weight/fruit (g)	Length	Width	Height
Phrao	T1	13.25 ± 0.96^a	201.36 ± 36.36^a	12.30 ± 0.75^a	5.29 ± 0.31^a	5.95 ± 0.49^a
	T2	12.50 ± 0.58^a	213.55 ± 12.39^a	12.60 ± 0.18^a	5.40 ± 0.19^a	6.14 ± 0.14^a
	T3	10.25 ± 0.50^b	209.97 ± 40.39^a	12.60 ± 1.10^a	5.34 ± 0.40^a	6.12 ± 0.42^a
	T4	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
Mae Taeng	T1	11.50 ± 1.29^a	385.84 ± 25.35^a	15.46 ± 0.46^a	6.92 ± 0.21^a	7.36 ± 0.15^a
	T2	11.50 ± 0.58^a	410.92 ± 31.99^a,b	16.10 ± 0.78a,^b	7.09 ± 0.09^a,b	7.64 ± 0.06^b
	T3	9.50 ± 0.58^b	452.41 ± 23.06^b	16.91 ± 0.82^b	7.31 ± 0.13^b	7.83 ± 0.21^b
	T4	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00

Values are presented as mean ± standard error.

T1 was honey bee cage (A. mellifera as pollinator), T2 was stingless bee cage (T. laeviceps species complex as pollinator), T3 was open plot (no cage and open pollinated trees) and T4 was closed cage (no pollinators).

The values with different superscript letters in a column are significantly different (p < 0.05)

J Ecol Environ 2022;46:- https://doi.org/10.5141/jee.22.012